Stuart Pomeranz
Saturday, January 8, 2000
To: Anyone who understands that "HARMLESS ERROR" is a contradictory statement.
My name is Stuart L Pomeranz #187155, I am 27 years old, I am an ex-death row inmate, now serving life, because the judge abused his discretion. The decision came from the Supreme Court December 24th 1997.
I am writing in hopes that you might find something in what I am about to explain that could persuade you to hopefully see issues in, that I could get you to argue for me. I have no representation.
1 My attorney has since been Disbarred by the Florida Bar Association, for crimes of dishonesty.
2. The Prosecutor quit and became a defense attorney after my conviction.
5. On 2 separate occasions Judge Cianca was found to abuse has discretion. First for a Robbery Trial, where I was granted a new trial, because he didn't allow my attorney to cross examine the key witness.
Then on Direct Appeal the Supreme Court remanded me for re-sentencing, I had an 8-4 decision for Life. The prosecutor "who quit" said he was satisfied with a Life sentence, but the judge overruled both jury and prosecutor and gave me the death penalty. The Supreme Court said the Judge abused his discretion for the second time, in cases that were separate.
BUT IT GETS BETTER . . .
The original charge was Armed Robbery and First Degree Murder
There is NO EYEWITNESS
There is NO FINGERPRINTS
There is an AUDIBLE WITNESS
who heard a "SPANISH TYPE" Accent say "does anyone
else want to Die", than
shots wore fired.
I am half Irish and half Russian Jew.
They had a witness who said a person between 5'5' and 5'7' with brown eyes, black hair, 150-170 pounds at or around the store before the murder acting suspicious.
I am 5,10, green eyed, heavily tattooed, 145 pounds with Brown hair
BUT IT GETS BETTER . . .
We subpoenaed the cash register receipts, because we wanted to compare the amount of money to the receipt. Not only was all the money accounted for. THERE WAS MORE THAN WHAT WAS ON THE RECEIPTS. This of course is all in the transcripts. The victim had 5000 dollars in hundreds in his pocket, there was 50-100 dollars on the counter, 2000 dollars in the cash register, and a 18 carat gold chain all in view and untouched.
We filed a motion to dismiss the charge of robbery, because there is nothing to substantiate the allegations . My codefendant says "I told him I took $50. " They then call the owner of the store, the victims wife who testified on the stand that all the money was accounted for.
They refused to acknowledge these facts in evidence and the Robbery charge stuck.
It should be noted the same store was closed by Federal Agencies, IRS, one year after incident for numerous counts of tax evasion, fraud etc.
There is in evidence my codefendants admission of purchasing the fire arm, having a $500 a day cocaine habit, and he was seen In the store and identified in open court bv witnesses who said he was in the store 5 minutes prior to murder 'looking crazy" as if on drugs. All this is on the record.
When the Prosecutor asked me to testify against my codefendant I told him to suck my dick, they went to my codefendant and he cut a deal.
Since that time, I am in receipt of a notarized letter from codefendant in which he states: 'he was badgered and coerced into testifying, and was told that if they had to they would fry his ass". He also stated " he lied to the Grand Jury for fear of his life" He was also coached by the state on what to say.
It should also be noted that the grand jury. "Palm Beach" refused to indict the first time.
Also in the record on transcripts the same judge who had two abuse of power discretions in cases pertaining to me, instructed in open court, that my codefendant should get off the witness stand until he could get his story straight!, and let the state take him to a room for several moments.
There is much, much more that I could explain, and all of what I have relayed is true, documented and flagrantly prejudicial.
They lost transcripts and had to lock up the court reporter to ensure she did the reconstruction hearing in timely manner.
My private investigator 'Julie Schwartz" asked me to marry her in open court. She was engaged to my attorney at the time. Hell of a conflict of interest there huh? Current affair and Inside Edition did a story on it.
Front Page of Stuart News "MURDER SUSPECT MARRIES P.I."
Palm Beach Post front page "GRAND JURY REFUSES TO INDICT SLAYING SUSPECT FOR LACK OF EVIDENCE."
My case is an excellent
case to fight. I am without representation and funds.
Must I pay for Life because
I'm indigent?
LET US COUNT THE WAYS . . . . .
NAFTA
Monica
Bosnia
Jennifer
Haiti
Paula
Mogadishu
Serbia
Everyone except Hilary
It is simple to call me
a criminal because I am in Prison, unlike a Lot of people, I wasn't afforded
the opportunity to make public statements and speeches saying I was a target
of a Right Wing Conspiracies, I mean who would believe that our "President"
could possibly be involved in . . . . .
White Water
Campaign Scams
FBI Cover ups
Sexual Misconduct
In reality he is the one Person who actually did show the rest of the world that Americans do what they want, when they want, yes its all the same, Money is power and so on. We know he "didn't inhale", and he never had an improper sexual relationship. I guess that's true, I don't consider getting a blow job improper myself. So who am I to judge?
Stuart L Pomeranz #187155
U.C.I. G-17
P.O. Box 221
Raiford, Fl 32083
The CCADP offers free webpages to over 500 Death Row Prisoners
Contact us for more information.
info@ccadp.org
"The Eyes Of The World Are Watching Now"