| The
Supreme Court ruled Feb. 15, 2001, that our Government must now first seek
assurances that the death penalty not be imposed as a prerequisite to any
extradition arrangements.
Supreme Court of Canada's Decision Regarding Extradition... http://ccadp.org/canada-supremecourt.htm |
News About the Case
New extradition law globalizes justice
BY PAUL WEINBERG Eye Weekly - Toronto
Is Simon Raghoonanan, the landed
immigrant and Toronto resident sitting
in the Metro West Detention Centre,
the same Simon Raghoonanan charged
with participating in the murder of a
state witness in Trinidad? Trinidadian
authorities think so, and have
requested his extradition to stand trial.
And, because of a new Canadian
extradition law that accepts evidence
even from governments with less
stringent legal requirements than
Canada's, Raghoonanan is set to go to
Trinidad, possibly to face the death
penalty.
The only evidence offered by the
Trinidadian authorities at the Toronto
extradition hearing was an enlarged
group photo, in which the accused's
head is "slightly bowed" and the bottom
third of his face "is not truly
straightforward," noted Justice Paul
Dilks in his deliberation. Nonetheless,
the judge determined "on the balance of probabilities" that the man
facing him in the courtroom is the same person being sought, and he
should be returned to Trinidad to stand trial.
Lawyers representing Raghoonanan are appealing Justice Dilks' Jan. 18
decision on constitutional grounds. One of them, Jeffrey House, notes
that Canadian law does not normally permit the introduction in a trial
of hearsay evidence -- e.g., when somebody hears somebody else
make a comment about the accused person. But that is exactly what
has happened in the hearing for his client, he claims.
The new federal law allows foreign governments to introduce evidence
"of a lower standard" for the purposes of having one of their nationals
or even a Canadian citizen brought to their jurisdiction to face trial
for
an offence allegedly committed there, and possible imprisonment or
worse if convicted, says House.
The Trinidadian government was not, for instance, required to provide
a fingerprint or a sworn affidavit by an eyewitness or official to
identify Raghoonanan. All it had to do was present a summary of the
evidence regarding Raghoonanan, as certified by their top legal
official, says Bill Corbett, a senior general counsel at the federal
Department of Justice in Ottawa. "[The certification] puts somebody's
name on the line, which wasn't the case before," he says.
Corbett says that with the "internationalization of crime" involving the
drug trade, fraud and terrorism, Canada has become more flexible with
regard to the types of evidence presented by countries with vastly
different legal systems.
While Trinidad's justice system is similar to Canada's in terms of a
shared British heritage, it differs in a major way: judges are mandated
to impose capital punishment for all convictions involving murder,
including for those only peripherally involved.
So Raghoonanan, who's accused of driving the getaway car following
the murder of Clint Huggins at the side of a road, faces the death
penalty if convicted.
Huggins was slated to testify against nine members of a drug gang
charged with the murder of a family. The men were found guilty and
were hanged on June 5, 1999. But the guilt of one of the nine, Russell
Sankerali, was placed in some doubt by a five-year-old taped police
interview with Huggins that strangely appeared on the eve of the
convicted going to the gallows. Despite the new evidence, which had
not been presented to Sankerali's defence counsel during his trial, the
Trinidad government proceeded with the hanging.
Trinidad has received a bad rap internationally, says retired Canadian
anthropology professor Frances Henry, who lives in Port of Spain, the
capital. She reports that the hangings of the gang were received with
applause. For Trinidadians, "[Sankerali] was a 'bandit' anyway -- so, if
he didn't participate in the family murders, he probably did a lot of
other equally bad deeds."
But Amnesty International takes the position that Canada should think
twice before sending Raghoonanan to face a flawed justice system in
which people charged with crimes spend long periods in detention and
are often unrepresented in court.
"The Trinidad government has been quite assertive in dismissing any
concerns we and others have raised about human rights protection
and the use of the death penalty in Trinidad," says Alex Neve,
secretary general of the Canadian section of Amnesty International.
TORONTO MAN ARRESTED FOR 1996 MURDER IN TRINIDAD
TORONTO,
Nov. 30 /CNW/ - THIS MORNING, ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE
ARRESTED A TORONTO MAN WANTED
IN TRINIDAD FOR THE SLAYING OF HIS COUSIN. THE
MURDER OF CLINT HUGGINS
TOOK PLACE ON THE ISLAND OF TRINIDAD ON FEBRUARY 20,
1996. THE VICTIM WAS A STATE
PROTECTED WITNESS. IT IS ALLEGED THAT THE ACCUSED
AND THREE OTHER PERSONS
LURED THE VICTIM TO A PARTY AFTER WHICH HE WAS KILLED.
ON REQUEST
FROM THE GOVERNMENT OF TRINIDAD, THE RCMP IMMIGRATION TASK
FORCE TRACKED THE SUSPECT
TO HIS RESIDENCE.
ARRESTED TODAY WAS:
SIMON RAGHOONANAN, age 37, of HUMBERLINE DRIVE, TORONTO, ON.
THE THREE
OTHER SUSPECTS HAVE BEEN RECENTLY ARRESTED IN TRINIDAD FOR THE
MURDER. THE INVESTIGATION
IN TRINIDAD IS BEING CONDUCTED BY THE CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT
IN PORT OF SPAIN, TRINIDAD.
The CCADP offers free webpages to over 500 Death Row Prisoners
Contact us for more information.
info@ccadp.org
"The Eyes Of The World Are Watching Now"