| Return to Robert Glen Jones Homepage |
Taken from Lamp of Hope: http://www.lampofhope.org/az70566.html
After the Darkest of Days the sun shines again
I know
that day will come
Through Sorrow's tears
Serenity
will come in time.
The greatest beauty
The greatest
pleasure
How beautiful
that you are
Wishing you strength for today
Hope for
tomorrow.
Is it so small a thing to have
enjoyed the sun?
Lived
in the light in the Spring?
To have Loved?
To have
Thought?
To have
Done?
Find peace in the hope of a sweeter tomorrow
The Flowers will always bloom
The sun
will always shine,
And the
rainbow will
Always
follow the
Storm….
My name is Robert Glen Jones Jr.
This letter is very
important to me and I ask you
to please take the time to read it. As
you are reading this I am sitting
on Death Row in Florence,
Arizona, fighting to save my life.
While you are reading this I ask
you to think about three questions:
#1. What are your beliefs on the
death penalty?
#2. Do you feel that a man should
be executed for a crime he did
not commit?
#3. Do you feel that the Prosecutors
and Detectives should be able
to get away with all the LIES
and MISCONDUCT that they want
to just to get their conviction?
I can PROVE that False Evidence
and False Testimony was used
to convict me of a crime I didn't
do/ I have Police Supplemental
Records and prior Trial Testimony
to PROVE that the Prosecutor
of my case LIED to the Judge and
Jury, committed Subordination
of Perjury and led witnesses to
give Implies Assertions… That the
Lead Detective committed Perjury
whilst testifying, and they both
allowed a witness to commit Perjury
while she testified. A “BAR
COMPLAINT” was filed with the
Arizona State Bar against the
Prosecutor of my case because
of his LIES and MISCONDUCT
during my trial. Last night I
received a letter from the Senior Bar
Council for Arizona State Bar
stating “It was determined that
probably cause exists for the
filing of a formal complaint against
David White by the State Bar.”
The FBI was also contacted concerning
the Prosecutors
MISCONDUCT. An investigation into
this matter was requested
and is even now going on. Already
another Prosecutor out of the
County Attorney's Office (as in
my case) and a different Lead
Detective has been reprimanded
because of the same type of
MISCONDUCT as was done at my trial.
Is this normal practice
for this County Attorney's Office?
Two Prosecutors out of the
same office involved in MISCONDUCT!
I need your help to save my life!
I cannot do this alone! I have
paperwork to PROVE the MISCONDUCT
committed by the
Prosecutor and Detectives. I believe
I can win a new trial if I have
a good attorney to fight for me.
I do not have the funds to pay the
fees of a good attorney and these
other people that I desperately
need! I do not want to be executed
for a crime I had NO part in. I
am asking for help in this fight
to save my life!!!
A little personal information about
myself. I am 31 (12-25-69),
5'11, and 159lbs. I am originally
from Northwest Texas. I like
most kinds of music. I like to
go hiking, camping, hunting and
fishing. I love to ride motorcycles
and enjoy 4-wheeling. I like to
go dancing and enjoy shooting
pool. I also enjoy working out. I am
very straight forward and not
into stupid head games. I like writing
and I love to read, which is how
I spend most of my time in here. I
am locked in a small cell 7 days
a week except for only 4 and a
half hours for showers and such.
Friends of any age, 18 and above,
who will look beyond where I am
at and take a chance on the man
insider these concrete walls.
If you are at all interested in my fight
to save my life after reading
this then please feel free to contact me.
I ask you not to just ignore my
letter but to show it to others for
them to read also. Any and all
interest to help me stop from being
EXECUTED is greatly appreciated
and desperately needed!
Thank you for your time and consideration.
I hope to hear from
you in the near future.
Until Then
Sincerely
Robert Glen Jones Jr.
#70566 #3G21
Arizona State Prison – Eyman
PO Box 3400 SMU II
Florence
Arizona 85232
SUBORNATION OF PERJURY: The offence
of procuring
another to take such false oath
as would constitute PERJURY in
the principal.
PERJURY: A false statement knowingly made in court.
IMPLIED ASERTIONS: Statements which,
while not expressed
may be deduced from what is written
or spoken.
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME SAVE MY LIFE??????
I need help to save my life. I
cannot do this alone. I beg you to
please take the time to read my
'information letter' that I've written
about my situation. The address
is: http://ccadp.org/robertglenjones.htm
A Man’s Fight for Justice...
The case of Robert Glen Jones, Arizona
I was arrested on the crimes of the Moon Smoke Shop and Fire Fighter
Union Hall murders in Tucson, Arizona. I was found "Guilty" and
sentenced to Death in 1998.
Now I am on Death Row in Florence, AZ.
Now I need the best attorney possible who is willing to take a chance
and
help me fight to save my life from a crime I did not commit.
This case was extremely 'High Profile' and voted the "Number 5" news
event of 1996 by local
papers. Approximately 850 print or television articles regarding
this case. The prosecutors were
desperate for a conviction. At the beginning, the case was based
on one man, David Nordstrom.
In July of 1997
during the grand jury process, a juror asked Det. Salgado;
"So all were basing this on is the statements of Mr. Nordstrom?"
And Det. Salgado,
"Robert Jones had a vehicle similar to the suspects vehicle.
Other witnesses who knew both
David Nordstrom and Robert Jones, stating Jones always wore the
cowboy hat, the western
wear, and liked to wear sunglasses. And once
the composites came out, Robert Jones
immediately stopped wearing that type of clothing."
NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE! What he did not tell the Grand Jury was
that during these months I
was riding a motorcycle. Hard to ride a motorcycle wearing a
cowboy hat. Wouldn't you think?
Now, David Nordstrom entered a 'Plea' because the prosecutor was about
to lose a motion filed by
Mr. Nordstrom's attorney to have all of his prior statements to the
police "Suppressed," because of
the detectives' very unscrupulous misconduct. The prosecutor
knew that once this happened he had
absolutely nothing to convict anyone with. Including David Nordstrom!
Mr. Nordstrom had already
told the prosecutor where to stick his first plea offer of 2-twenty
year sentences. Throughout David
Nordstrom's tape-recorded statements, he was caught lying numerous
times and continued to be
caught lying all the way through his second arrest statements.
When detectives would question him
on his lying, he would then change his story. Only then would
he change it! This is defined in the
Webster's Dictionary as "Lying," not as the detectives and prosecutors
put it. "He was just giving
more information." Yeah right! Its called "Lying"!
The detectives know he was lying so they have
him take a polygraph test. The reasons are obvious for whoever
reads his statements and David
Nordstrom of course failed the polygraph.
By the time I got to trial, the Prosecution Team had three main witnesses
they used to convict me.
David Nordstrom, the prosecutions key witness. Lana Irwin, also
important and plus used to
corroborate David Nordstrom. And David Evans, who up to the beginning
of 1997 was telling his
girlfriend he did not believe I committed these crimes. Then
the detectives started talking to him.
The information in my case is hard to explain and to understand unless
you take the time to read it
all. Then you would see the 'Gross Injustice' done to me!
The basic fact is I was 'Railroaded' by the
Prosecution Team to protect their key witness, David Nordstrom, and
to get their conviction.
Prosecutorial Misconduct, Detective Misconduct, Implied Assertions,
Subornation of Perjury and
Perjury itself, all committed by the 'Key' players of the Prosecution
Team. These powerful
allegations can be proven the truth. Prosecutor David White lied
to the Jury in stating information in
his opening and closing statements, that he knew to be false.
Through witnesses by Implied
Assertions he corroborated a witness he knew was lying and giving false
information to the Jury.
David White lied to the Judge during my trial at a sidebar. Lana
Irwin's entire testimony was
Perjury. Det. Brenda Woolridge committed Perjury while testifying
on the stand. Her and Det.
Salgado both lied to my trial attorney during a Defense Interview before
my trial. Of course David
Nordstrom's continuous lying throughout all of this and the fact that
David Nordstrom wrote notes
(proven to be his handwriting) trying to get another inmate to beat
him up so he could "Sue" the
county. In addition, the fact he was trying to get this same
inmate to kidnap his girlfriend and her
children so he could make it look like we sent him after them.
I did not have a telephone at my home until the middle of June 1996.
Up to that point, I used one of
two pay phones in my complex or one of three pay phones at the Circle
K near my home. On May
30th, 1996 at 6:14 p.m. a 911 call was placed about a robbery/murder
in progress. By David
Nordstrom's story around 6:30 p.m., himself, his brother Scott Nordstrom,
and I are driving south
on the freeway (out on the other side of town from where I lived) on
the way to take him home. By
phone records of a cellular phone Scott Nordstrom carried all of the
time, a call was made at 6:24
p.m. to the payphone I used a lot at the Circle K (520-298-9516) near
my home.
David Whites theory is I must have been calling Chris Lee, an 'ex'
roommate of mine. Which is not
possible because Chris Lee did not move in with me until 'after' the
first of June!
I believe this can be proven! So, if Chris Lee can be proven
not to have been living with me at this
time and I am suppose to be driving down the freeway with the Nordstrom
brothers, then why is
Scott Nordstrom's cellular phone being used to call the pay phone by
my home that I used a lot? It
is my belief that I was being called.
I have Disclosures, Police Supplemental Reports, and Trial Testimony
to prove just about everything
I have written. Some investigating I believe will Prove the rest!
If I had a good Attorney, I would not be sitting here on Death Row
right now. The saying "money
talks," is a sad fact of reality, but it is a reality, none the less!
I do not have the money to adequately
defend myself, so I am begging for help, to save my life! I have
been told that, for an Attorney
whom fights for what he/she believes in, my case is an "Attorneys Dream
Case." I do not want to
sound arrogant, far from it, I am sacred to death. I am an innocent
man, sitting on Death Row,
because of Prosecutorial Misconduct, Detectives Misconduct, Implied
Assertions, Subornation of
Perjury, and Perjury itself. I am not sure what else a Good Attorney
could find. I know nothing
about the Law and I found these things! So, what could be found
by an Attorney who really knows
what they are doing?
I would like to Thank You in advance for any help with my defense, any
advice you may be willing
to give me, or any donations to offer for my defense, only used to
help save my life. Any and all help
would be greatly appreciated!
If this, 'any of this', is of interest to you, Please feel free to
contact me. I am looking forward to
hearing from you...
Sincerely,
Robert Glen Jones Jr.
For More Information
Robert Glen Jones Jr.
#70566 3G-21
Arizona State Prison - Florence - Eyman
SMU II - Death Row
P. O. Box 3400
Florence, Arizona 85232
USA
David White, in his 'Opening Statement' lied to the Jury:
"And there are doors here, this is a bathroom and this is a closet.
One of these doors has been kicked
in. Apparently the 'Shooter' kicked in the door, ordered Tom
Hardman to come out, lay on the ground,
then executed him, two shots." This is what he says 'Noel Engles' sees
when he runs into the back
room and out the rear door of the Moon Smoke Shop.
Further, on into his statement, concerning what 'Lana Irwin' will testify
to, he says:
"One of the places, the door was kicked open to get to the victim,"
then, "Somebody having
a door kicked open."
Now, the very first witness, 'Noel Engles,' into my trial he corroborates
'Lana Irwin' by Implied
Assertions:
Q: "To your knowledge, were any of those doors broken or smashed,
or any thing like that, prior to this
date?"
A: "I don't think so!"
A later witness, Detective Joseph Godoy, through Implied Assertions,
also corroborated 'Lana
Irwin' mentioned above:
Q: "Did you find any damage to one of those doors in the back
room?"
A: "Yes!"
Q: (States 15 & 16) "Do those represent a door that you saw,
that was damaged?"
A: "Yes!"
Now, corroborated 'Lana Irwin,' in her trial testimony, discussing overhearing
me (supposedly)
talk about 'Acts of Violence' in Tucson. David White is asking
her questions in Subornation of
Perjury:
Q: "Do you remember hearing any conversation about doors?"
A: "One door was open, and one had to be kicked in!"
Q: "I'm sorry, One 'had' to be kicked in?"
A: "YES! One was kicked. One was open!"
There are many other things this woman says, that can be 'PROVEN' false,
by records. Also
corroborating 'Lana Irwin', David White is now on 'Direct' with Detective
Brenda Woolridge.
Here, David White in 'Subornation of Perjury' and Detective Woolridge
in 'Perjury', say:
Q: "Did Lana Irwin tell you something about a door being
kicked in?"
A: "YES, she did!"
Q: "Was there, a door kicked in, in one of these cases?"
A: "YES, in the back room, at the Smoke Shop."
Q: "As shown in 'States 50?"
A: "YES, it is!"
Q: "The fact that a door was kicked in, was that ever mentioned
at the other trial, concerning this
case?"
A: "NO, it was not!"
In David Whites 'Closing Arguments', he is corroborating 'Lana Irwin',
while "LYING" to the
Jury, when he says:
"She overhears the defendant saying a door had to be kicked in.
Remember that?
And we have a door kicked in. We have a photograph, one of these
doors, this one right here, 58, was
kicked in. Now ladies and gentlemen, that particular fact wasn't
even brought out at the trial of the other
guy, Scott Nordstrom. That didn't come out at the trial and yet Lana
Irwin tells you she over heard this
defendant telling Coats, "the one door had to be kicked in," and sure
enough."
Then later David White says:
"Scott Nordstrom chased Tom Hardman to the back room, where to gets
him out of the door, lays him
on the ground and executes him."
This is all very important! This is all used to corroborate Lana
Irwin to make the Jury believe she is
a truthful, important witness. She is also used to corroborate
David Nordstrom, that I must have
been the one to commit these murders, not David Nordstrom. Because
how else would she have
known these things unless I was there and she overheard me talking
about them. That's the
Prosecution Teams theory! Very important! For one simple
reason! I was set up to protect David
Nordstrom. The Prosecutions key witness! What do I mean?
I mean, there was No other
evidence against me except David Nordstrom and the State used false
testimony/evidence against
me to get their conviction. And this can be proven through Police
Supplemental Reports and prior
Trial Testimony at Scott Nordstrom's trial. Supplemental Reports
done by Sgt. Grimshaw #3964
and Officer Charvoz #27144 who both say that Sgt. Grimshaw told Officer
Charvoz to kick in this
door. Which he did, in the Moon Smoke Shop at 6:32 p.m., 16 to
18 minutes after the murderers
had left.
Det. Joseph Godoy at Scott Nordstrom's trial testified with David White
on 'Direct':
Pg. 200 - Lines 6-7
A: "Then we broke down the door; Actually broke down the door."
Lines 10-11
Q: "The door that had to be kicked into, uniform officers did
that?"
A: "Yes!"
Lines 13-14
Q: The intruders didn't do that?"
A: "No!" "They Did Not!
All of this shows that David White lied to the Jury during his Opening
Statements, leads witnesses to
give Implied Assertions, committed Subornation of Perjury of Lana Irwin
and Det. Brenda Woolridge, both
of which committed Perjury while on the stand testifying. In
addition, David White lied again in his
Closing Arguments. We can prove this to be fact because David
White, Det. Woolridge and Det.
Salgado were in the court room when Det. Godoy testified in Scott Nordstrom's
trial that Police are the
ones who in fact, kicked in the door at the Moon Smoke Shop.
Not the intruders! They knew and had Lana Irwin give False Testimony!
All of this clearly shows Lana Irwin Never overheard Any conversations
by me. The important question is
'How did she get the information she testified to?' I believe
the Detectives! If David White is willing to Lie
to the Judge, Lie to the Jury and commit Subornation of Perjury, Det.
Brenda Woolridge is willing to
commit Perjury and they are willing to allow Lana Irwin to commit Perjury,
then...What else are they
willing to do to get their conviction? How far are they willing
to go? Those are the questions!
Lies, Manipulation, Connive, Deceit, Trickery, and Cunningness! This is Only the beginning!
- information provided by Robert Glen Jones -
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT...
#1. What are your beliefs on the death penalty?
#2. Do you feel that a man should be executed for a crime that he
did not commit?
#3. Do you feel that the Prosecutors and Detectives should be able
to get away with all the LIES and MISCONDUCT they want to just
get their conviction?
I can PROVE that False Evidence and False Testimony was used to
convict me of a crime I didn't do. I have Police Supplemental Reports
and prior Trial Testimony to PROVE that the Prosecutor of my case
LIED to the Judge and jury, committed Subornation of Perjury and
led witnesses to give Implied Assertions... That the Lead Detective
committed Perjury while testifying and they both allowed a witness
to commit Perjury while she testified. A “BAR COMPLAINT” was filed
with the Arizona State Bar against the Prosecutor of my case
because of his LIES and MISCONDUCT during my trial. Last night I
received a letter from the Senior Bar Counsel for the Arizona State
Bar stating "It was determined that probable cause exists for the
filing of a formal complaint against David White by the State Bar."
The FBI was also contacted concerning the prosecutors
MISCONDUCT. An investigation into this matter was requested and is
even now going on. Already another Prosecutor out of the County
Attorneys Office (as in my case) and a different Lead Detective has
been reprimanded because of the same type of MISCONDUCT as was
done at my trial. Is this normal practice for this County Attorney’s
office? Two Prosecutors out of the same office involved in
MISCONDUCT!
I need help to save my life! I cannot do this alone! I have the
paperwork to PROVE the MISCONDUCT committed by the Prosecutor
and Detectives. I believe I can win a new trial if I have a good
attorney to fight for me. I do not have the funds to pay the fees of
a good attorney and these other people that I desperately need! I
do not want to be executed for a crime I had NO part in. I am asking
for help in this fight to save my life!!
A little personal information about myself. I am 31 (12-25-69), 5' 11,
and 159 tbs. I am originally from Northeast Texas. I like most kinds
of music. I like to go hiking, camping, hunting and fishing. I love to
ride motorcycles and enjoy 4-wheeling. I like to go dancing and
enjoy shooting pool. I also enjoy working out. I am very straight
forward and not into stupid head games. I like writing and I love to
read, which is how I spend most of my time in here. I am locked in a
small cell 7 days a week except for only 41/2 hours for showers and
such. Any correspondence to take away these lonely hours would be
GREAT. Friends of any age, 18 and above, who will look beyond
where I am at and take a chance on the man inside these concrete
walls. If you are at all interested in my fight to save my life after
reading this please feel free to contact me. I ask you not to just
ignore my letter but to show it to others for them to read also_ Any
and all interest to help me stop from being EXECUTED is greatly
appreciated and desperately needed!
Thank you for your time and consideration. I hope to hear from you
in the near future.
Until Then,
Sincerely,
Robert Glen Jones Jr.
SUBORNATION OF PERJURY: The offense of procuring another to
take such a false oath as would constitute PERJURY in the principal.
PERJURY: A false statement knowingly made in a proceeding in a
court.
IMPLIED ASSERTIONS: Statements which, while not expressed may
be deduced from
What is written or spoken.
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME SAVE MY LIFE????????
8/22/01
Dear Traci,
Hello again. I t was nice to receive your letter tonight. Thank
you
for responding and putting up the materials I sent. I hope that all
is
well with you and yours. That y’all are in the best of health.
I do
understand why it took you so long to write back. It’s okay and I’m
pretty sure you are extremely busy. Sounds like a lot of people have
written you, other inmates, over the last month.
I would never disrespect you by sending you anything distasteful to
post. I don’t believe that would be right.
I am going to enclose a copy of the information letter that I have
written concerning my situation. Everything that I have written is
the truth and can be proven with paperwork here in my cell. Life
in
here is bad especially if you have nobody out there who cares.
When my mom died in October of ’99 I lost everything I had out
there. I no longer have any help.
It would be great if what you post gains me even a little interest in
my situation. Thank you for your efforts and what you are doing.
Don’t worry about whatever the problem is with the NBCi from
CAADP. I’m not sure what the problem is but apparently it’s been
happening for quite awhile. I’ve given up on it being there.
With what I am sending you now you will have all the up to date
information. I would like you r opinion of what I have written after
you read it.
You have a great heart it seems. I’m not sure of you are interested
in writing as friends, with all the others writing also. ,
I am going to
cut this short.
Until next time,
Utmost respect,
Robert
My name is Robert Glen Jones Jr and I beg of you to PLEASE take
the time to read this information...
State of Arizona vs. Robert Glen Jones Jr.
No. CR?98?0537?AP
Pima County No CR?57526
I was arrested on the crimes of the Moon Smoke Shop and Fire
Fighter Union Hall murders in Tucson, Arizona. I was found guilty and
sentenced to death in 1998. Now I am on death row in Florence,
Arizona. My first appeal, my 'Direct Appeal' was denied as I found
out yesterday by someone who heard the TV announcing the courts
decision. Now I need the best attorney possible who is willing to
take a chance and help me fight to save my life from a crime I did
not commit.
?The Prosecution Team-
Prosecutor David White, Detective Brenda Woolridge, Detective Ed
Salgado
This case was extremely "High Profile" and voted the "Number 5
News Event of 1996" by local papers. There were approximately 850
print or television articles regarding this case. The prosecutors were
desperate for a conviction. At the beginning the case was based on
one man, David Nordstrom. In July of 1997 during the Grand Jury
process, a juror asked Detective Salgado, "So all were basing this on
is the statements of Mr. Nordstrom?" And Detective Salgada
answered, "Robert Jones had a vehicle similar to the suspects
vehicle. Other witnesses who knew both David Nordstrom and Robert
Jones, stating Robert Jones always wore the cowboy hat, the
western wear and liked to wear sunglasses. And once the
composites came out, Robert Jones immediately stopped wearing
that type of clothing.
NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE!!
What he did not tell the Grand Jury was that during these months I
was riding a motorcycle. Hard to ride a motorcycle wearing a cowboy
hat, wouldn't you think?
Now David Nordstrom entered a PLEA because the Prosecutor was
about to lose a "motion" filed by Mr. Nordstrom's attorney to have all
of his prior statements to the police "suppressed" because of the
detectives Very Unscrupulous Misconduct. The prosecutor knew that
once this happened he had absolutely nothing to convict anyone
with, including David Nordstrom! Mr. Nordstrom had already turned
down the prosecutor's first "plea" offer of two twenty?year
sentences. Throughout David Nordstrom's tape?recorded statements
he was caught lying numerous times and continued to be caught
lying all the way through his "Second Arrest" statement. When
detectives would question him on his lying, only then would he
change his story! This is defined in the Webster's dictionary as
LYING! Not as the detectives and prosecutors put it.." He was just
giving more information" Yeah Right! It's called lying! The detectives
know he was lying so they have him take a polygraph test. The
reasons are obvious for whoever reads his statements. And David
Nordstrom of course FAILED THE POLYGRAPH!!
By the time I got to trial, the prosecution team had three main
witnesses they used to
convict me. David Nordstrom, the prosecutions key witness, Lana
Irwin, also important and plus used to corroborate David Nordstrom
and David Evans, who up to the beginning of 1997 was telling his
girlfiiend that he did not believe I committed these crimes. Then the
detectives started talking to him!
The information in my case is hard to explain and to understand
unless you take the time to read it all. Then you would see the
"gross injustice done to me!" The basic fact is I was "railroaded" by
the prosecution team to protect their key witness, David Nordstrom,
and to get their conviction. Prosecutorial Misconduct, Detectives
Misconduct, Implied Assertions, Subornation of Perjury and Perjury
itself. All committed by the "key" players of the prosecution team.
These powerful allegations can be proven the truth! Prosecutor
David White lied to the jury in stating information in his Opening And
Closing Statements that he knew to be false. Through witnesses by
Implied Assertions he corroborated a witness he knew was lying and
giving false information to the jury. David White lied to the Judge
during my trial at a "sidebar". Lana Irwin' s entire testimony was
Perjury. Detective Brenda Woolridge committed Perjury while
testifying on the stand. Detective Woolridge and Detective Salgado
both LIED to my trial attorney during a defense interview before my
trial. Of course David Nordstroms' continuous lying throughout all of
this and the fact that David Nordstrom wrote notes (proven to be
his handwriting) trying to get another inmate to beat him up so he
could "sue" the county. In addition, the fact he was trying to get
this same inmate to kidnap his girlftiend and her children so he could
make it look like we sent him after them.
David Nordstrom's Complete Manipulations!
I did not have a telephone at my home until the middle of June 1996.
Up to that point I used one of two pay phones in my complex or one
of three pay phones at the Circle K near my home. On May 30th,
1996 at 6:14 pm a 911 call was placed about a robbery/murders in
progress. By David Nordstrom's story around 6:30 pm himself, his
brother Scott Nordstrom and I are driving south on the freeway (out
on the other side of town from where I lived) on the way to take him
home. By phone records of a cellular phone Scott Nordstrom carried
all of the time, a call was made at 6:24 pm to the pay phones I used
a lot at the Circle K (520?298?9516) near my home. David White's
theory is I must have been calling Chris Lee, an ex?roommate of
mine. Which is not possible because Chris Lee did not move in with
me until after the first of June. I believe this can be proven! So, if
Chris Lee can be proven not to have been living with me at this time
and I am supposed to be driving down the freeway with the
Nordstrom brothers then why is Scott Nordstroms cellular phone
being used to call the pay phones by my home that I used a lot. It is
my belief that I was being called.
I have Disclosures, Police Supplemental Reports and Trial Testimony
to PROVE just about everything that I have written. Some
investigating I believe will PROVE the rest! The things I have written
on pages A? I to A?4 are in no way harmless error! This was all major
evidence used against me at my trial, which can be all proven
Perjury.
If I had a good attorney I would not be sitting here on Death Row
right now. The saying "money talks" is a sad fact of reality, but it is
reality none the less. I do not have the money to adequately defend
myself so I am begging for help to save my life. I am scared to
death. I am an innocent man sitting on death row because of Lies
and Misconduct committed by the prosecution team. I know nothing
about the law and I found issues of Prosecutorial Misconduct,
Detectives Misconduct, Implied Assertions, Subordination of Perjury
and Perjury itself. What could be found by a good attorney who
really knows what he or she is doing?
I do not know whether or not the Nordstrom brothers were involved
in these crimes. All I do know is that I was not involved and I am not
going to make up lies, like many others in this case, just to save
myself. I feel that because I would not make a statement about
crimes I knew nothing about that I was set up and railroaded by the
prosecution team to get their conviction. Now I am fighting to save
my life for crimes I did not commit. I had NO personal knowledge of
these crimes and have to use paperwork that was disclosed to me
through my trial attorney by the County Attorney's Office. I relied
completely upon my attorney the first time through all of this and
really didn't get involved because I knew nothing about the law. I
figured he was my attorney so let him do his job, MISTAKE!! I believe
that with a good attorney and some investigating I will be able to
PROVE my innocence.
According to a study recently conducted by New York's Columbia
University Law School and based on a review of 4,600 cases from
1973 to 1995, it seems that serious errors occur in nearly 70 percent
of all trials leading to the death penalty. Researchers found serious
errors, suppressed evidence, judge's mistakes, and jury bias in 68 of
every 100 cases. The incentives are to generate a lot of death
sentences, even ones that don't belong there, even ones that you
have to cut comers to get there and let someone else worry about it
over the next 9 years, 10 years to see what happens. Efforts to
make changes to the capitol punishment system at the state and
federal levels are under way with a handful of state legislatures
re?examining the death penalty practices. This study also found that
incompetent counsel is to blame for many of the errors in death
penalty cases. Thirty seven percent of all the errors that are being
found in this system are because of lawyers that are so bad that
you can actually prove that the outcome would have been different
if you had a better lawyer. Two out of three convictions were
overturned on appeal, mostly because of serious errors by
incompetent defense lawyers or overzealous police and prosecutors
who withheld evidence. Seventy five percent of the people whose
death sentences were set aside were later given lesser sentences
after retrial, in plea bargains or by order of a Judge. Another seven
percent were found innocent on retrial. Eighteen percent were given
the death penalty on retrial, but many of these had their convictions
overturned again in the appeals process.
Closer to home here in Arizona, the study released by Columbia
University says that Arizona ranks second in nation in the number of
death sentences it imposes per capita, but it also reports that nearly
eighty percent of those convictions were overturned. Those
conclusions call for "A very close and serious look" at Arizona's court
system says James A. Liebman, the Law Professor and former
defense attorney who led the study. Others refer to the increasing
number of death row inmates who are released after their
convictions are overturned. Eighty?five death row inmates have
been released, including eight here in Arizona. The Pima County
Attorneys office in Tucson, Arizona is already under investigation
because of Misconduct by one of their career prosecutors, a veteran
of at least twenty?five years. A prosecutor who supplied the leading
question, Subornation of Perjury to the Lead Detective. A detective
who admittedly supplied the false answer committed Perjury. The
newspaper quotes him as saying, "He lied because he was trying to
avoid jeopardizing a confidential informant." This excuse or
explanation appears to be "poppycock!" The US Supreme Court has
definitively detailed the lawful manner in which a police officer can
protect the identity of a confidential informant. Attorneys have been
refused the identity of an informant on these legal grounds and
Judges readily grant this protection to the prosecutors and the
police. So this explanation doesn't make sense or should I really say
EXCUSE? This does not in anyway justify his Perjury!
Now a second prosecutor, from the Pima County Attorneys Office, in
my case is also guilty of the same type of misconduct as the one
mentioned before. Is this normal practice for this County Attorney's
Office? A "bar complaint" has been filed with the Arizona State Bar
against David White because of his LIES and MISCONDUCT during my
trial. An investigation into this matter has been requested, because I
have Disclosure and prior Trial Testimony to PROVE that David White
committed Pedury and Subornation of Perjury. And the two lead
Homicide Detectives both committed Perjuries while testifying. If the
prosecution teams case against me was "so strong" as they said it
was, then why did they themselves have to LIE to the judge and
jury? Why did they have to use False Evidence and Testimony to get
a conviction? Because they knew I wasn't involved in these crimes.
They were desperate for a conviction and couldn't get it any other
way. Now I am asking for help to put right what was done to me in
the name of "so called" Justice!
What I am looking for is a good attorney, investigators, specialists,
experts, etc who are willing to help me fight to save my life. I can
not do this myself because access has been denied to us on
Arizona's Death Row to any law library material. Donations to help
pay the fees for these people whom I truly need would be GREATLY
APPRECIATED. I beg of you for any of the help that is desperately
needed. To send a donation for my defense fund, send any money
order, (no cash or checks) ... Please put my full name,
Robert Glen Jones Jr. # 70566 on the money order.
Any help will be great! More then I could ever explain in words!
Though I would like to thank you in advance for any help with my
defense, any advice you may be willing to give me or any donations
to offer for my defense to be ONLY used to help save my life.
If any of this is of interest to you PLEASE feel free to contact me. I
am looking forward to hearing from you in the near future. Please
read the examples that I have written on the following pages
showing exactly the type of Misconduct I mean.
For more information contact
Robert Glen Jones Jr. #70566 # 3G21
Arizona State Prison?Eyman
PO Box 3400 SMUII Florence, AZ 85230 U.S.A.
Utmost Respect,
Robert Glen Jones Jr.
A?1
David White in his Opening Statement immediately LIES to the jury,
"And there are doors here, this is a bathroom and this is a closet.
One of these doors has been kicked in. Apparently the shooter
kicked in the door, ordered Tom Hardman to come out and lay on the
ground and executed him, two shots."
This is what he says Noel Engles sees when he runs into the back
room and out the rear door of the Moon Smoke Shop. Further into
his Statement concerning what Lana Irwin will testify to he says;
"One of the places the door was kicked open to get to the victim."
Then, " Somebody having a door kicked open."
Now the very first witness, Noel Engles, into my trial he corroborates
Lana Irwin by Implied Assertions?,
Q: "To your knowledge were any of these doors broken or smashed
or anything like that prior to this date?"
A: "I don't think so."
A later witness, Detective Joseph Godoy, through Implied Assertions
also corroborated what Lana Irwin mentioned above;
Q: 'Did you find any damage to one of those doors in the back
room?"
A: "Yes"
Q: (States 15 & 16) 'Do those represent a door that you saw that
was damaged?"
A: "Yes"
Now corroborated Lana Irwin in her testimony discussing overhearing
me (supposedly) talk about "acts of violence" in Tucson. David White
is asking her questions in Subornation of Perjury;
Q: " Do you remember hearing any conversation about doors?"
A: "One door was open and one had to be kicked in."
Q: "I'm sorry, One had to be kicked in?"
A?2
A: “Yes, One was kicked, one was open."
There are many other things that Lana Irwin says that can be
PROVEN FALSE by records. Also corroborating Lana Irwin, David
White is now on Direct with Detective Brenda Woolridge. Here David
White in "Subornation of Perjury'' and Detective Woolridge in
"Perjury" say:
Q: “Did Lana Irwin tell you something about a door being kicked in?"
A: "Yes, she did. "
Q: "Was there a door kicked in in one of these cases?"
A: "Yes, in the backroom of the Smoke Shop."
Q: "As shown in States 50?"
A: "Yes, it is."
Q: "The fact that a door was kicked in, was that ever mentioned at
the other trial concerning the case?"
A: "No, it was not."
Now in David White's Closing Statements he is corroborating Lana
Irwin while LYING to the jury when he says; "She overhears the
defendant saying a door had to be kicked in. Remember that? And
we have a door kicked in. We have a photograph, one of these
doors, this one right here, 58, was kicked in. Now ladies and
gentlemen, that particular fact wasn't even brought out at the trial
of the other guy, Scott Nordstrom. That didn't come out at the trial
and yet Lana Irwin tells you she overheard this defendant telling
Coats, "the one door had to be kicked in." And sure enough. Then
later David White says; "Scott Nordstrom chased Tom Hardman to
the back room where he gets him out of the door and lays him on
the ground and executes him. ‘
A?3
This Is All Very Important!!
This is all used to corroborate Lana Irwin to make the jury believe
she is a truthful, important witness. She is also used to corroborate
David Nordstrom, that I must have been the one to commit these
murders. Not David Nordstrom, because how else would she have
known these things unless I was there and she overheard me talking
about them. That's the prosecution teams theory.
Very Important For One Simple Reason!!
I was set up to protect David Nordstrom, the prosecutions key
witness. What do I mean? I mean there was NO other evidence
against me except David Nordstrom and the State used False
Testimony/Evidence against me to get their conviction. And this can
be proven through Police Supplemental Reports and prior Trial
Testimony at Scott Nordstrom's trial. Supplemental reports done by
Sgt. Grimshaw #3964 and Officer Charvoz # 27144 who both say
that Sgt. Grimshaw told Officer Charvoz to kick in this door (which
he did) in the back room at the Moon Smoke Shop at 6:32 pm, 16 to
18 minutes after the murderers had left. Detective Joseph Godoy at
Scott Nordstrom's trial testified with David White on 'Direct";
Pg. 200 Lines 6?7.
A: "Then we broke down the door, Actually broke down the door ...”
Lines 10? 11
Q: "The door that had to be kicked in, uniform officers did that?"
A: "Yes"
Lines 13?14
Q: "The intruders didn't do that?"
A: "No! They did not!"
A?4
All of this shows that David White LIED to the jury during his opening
statements, leads witnesses to give Implied Assertions, committed
Subornation of Perjury of Lana Irwin and Detective Brenda Woolridge.
Both of which committed Perjury while on the stand testifying. In
addition, David White LIED again in his Closing Statements. We can
PROVE this to be fact because David White, Detective Woolridge and
Detective Salgado were in the courtroom when Detective Godoy
testified in Scott Nordstoms trial that Police Officers are the ones
who in fact kicked in the door at the Moon Smoke Shop. Not the
intruders! They knew and still had Lana Irwin give False Testimony!
All of this clearly shows Lana Irwin never overheard any
conversations by me. The important question is "How did she get the
information he testified to?" I believe the Detectives! If David White
is willing to LIE to the Judge, LIE to the Jury and commit Subornation
of Perjury, Detective Brenda Woolridge is willing to commit Perjury
and they are willing to allow Lana Irwin to commit Perjury then...
What else are they willing to do to get their conviction? How far are
they willing to go? Those are the questions!!
LIES! MANIPULATION! CONNIVE! DECEIT! TRICKERY! CUNNINGNESS!
THIS IS ONLY ThE BEGINNING!
My Direct Appeal was recently denied so now there is NO point in
keeping my information quiet about the willingness of the Prosecution
Team to lie to get their conviction. Because of my Rule 32,
everything will be brought out into the open. After reading this letter
if you are at all interested in contacting me, Please do. Also, if you
know of others who might be interested in any way, feel free to
send them a copy. Any help would be great!!
GREETINGS
This is an update on the information of my case. My trial attorneys
were contacted by my appeal attorney concerning the Police
Supplemental Reports done by Sgt. Grimshaw and Officer Charvoz.
Remember that these are the two police officers who say that they
are the ones involved in "kicking in" the door of the Moon Smoke
Shop. The trial attorneys say that the prosecutor never Disclosed
these important Supplemental Reports to them. One attorney said he
would have remembered if the prosecutor had because he is on
"friendly terms" with one of these officers. I am told that the trial
attorneys are willing to do affidavits saying that they never received
these police supplemental reports in disclosure from the prosecutor.
The prosecutor didn't Disclose this important evidence that
contradicted the lies that he was telling the judge and jury. Why do
you think he keeps this important evidence from my defense
attorney?
Prosecutor David White has finally filed his reply to my "bar
complaint". All paperwork has been filed with the Arizona State Bar
and we are now waiting for the State Bar to make a decision. The
investigation is on going.
All David White did in his reply was tell more lies to try to cover up
his lies and Misconduct during my trial. David White considers lying
to the judge and jury during my trial as a MINOR MISTAKE OF FACT
IN THE TRIAL OF STATE VS JONES.
David White repeatedly lied to the judge and jury about information
and evidence that he knew to be false. He used evidence against me
saying that the suspects are the ones who kicked in this door at the
Moon Smoke Shop. When he knew for a fact that police officers are
the ones who kicked in this door at least 15 minutes after the
suspects had left.
Also included in David Whites reply was an Affidavit done by
Detective Brenda Woolridge signed November 1st, 2000. In this
Affidavit she admits sat through Scott Nordstrom's trial and she
admits that she knew that the door was forced open by uniformed
officers. With this Affidavit Detective Woolridge admits to committing
Perjury while testifying during my trial.
No matter how many lies they tell trying to "cloud" and "confuse" the
issues, the facts of the case are that the prosecutor and detectives
used LIES, FALSE EVIDENCE, and FALSE TESTIMONY against me to
get their conviction. I am fighting to save my life for a crime I did
not commit because of their LIES and MISCONDUCT! My Rule 32
Appeal is next and I truly believe that with a good attorney I can
win a new trial.
I am still in need of a lot of help. I cannot do this alone. Even a small
donation to help pay for stamps, paper, pens and envelopes would
be of enormous help right now so I can continue to send out letters
trying to gain interest in my situation. No matter what, I want to
thank you for taking the time to read my information. I hope to hear
from you in the near future.
Utmost Respect,
Robert Glen Jones Jr.
May 29, 2001
The State Bar of Arizona has finally made a decision about the “BAR
COMPLAINT” that was filed by my attorney and myself. The intial
investigation was completed, then the matter was submitted to the
Probable Cause Panelist of the State Bar of Arizona for review.
After this review, it was determined that probable cause exists for
the filing of a FORMAL COMPLAINT against the prosecutor David
White by the State Bar.
This is good news for my chances to win a new trial with the Rule 32
Appeal.
10/16/01
Dear Traci,
Hello again. It was nice to hear from you again and I do completely
understand why the delay in writing back. It’s okay. With kids, your
husband, and all the work you are doing on the site you’ve got to be
extremely busy. Hello to your husband, too. I hope al is well with you
and your family; that y’all are in the best of health. I hope your site
is doing well and lots of people are reading what you post. What all
have you been up to lately? Things are pretty much the same
around here. Just another day.
Yesterday though, I was taken out on the chain gang again to work
in the sort of garden. Today I’m feeling the sunburn. I don’t tan so
that’s a bummer. I just burn then turn white again.
I didn’t know that you put up the letters on a regular basis from the
inmates who write to you. I will let you know when I write something
I don’t want posted. I will also try to write a letter about my past to
help the kids. Life of the streets, stealing cars, drug use, etc. I’m
not sure how long it takes but I’ll try, okay?
My mom was more like my best friend and we got along great. We
could talk about anything and everything. Plus we went through a
lot together because of my stepfather’s violence. She was pretty
much all I had out there and could count on. I miss her very much.
Where are you from in Texas? I’m from Tyler, Texas, but I lived in
Longview, Malakoff, and Athens, too. How long have you lived in
Nevada and what made you move there? I love country music! But I
do listen to a variety. I can’t stand rap at all. Who is your favorite
country singer? Group? Song? There are so many good artists these
days that it’s hard to decide which I like more.
I understand completely about life’s experiences teaching lessons. I
am on Death row for a crime I didn’t commit because I trusted
someone I thought was a friend. I would like to explain sometime to
you. I won’t lie; I do need help. But when I first started looking for
pen pals I decided not to ask for money. If someone helps me I want
it to be because they want to. Not because I asked. I would prefer
to continue doing without than have someone think I am trying to
use them. Does that make sense to you?
I’m not into organized religion either. It just seems it’s all about
money. Always trying to get people to send them money for different
things but then you hear of them living in million dollar homes, driving
fancy cars and sailing yachts. It seems they help nobody but
themselves. I’ve always believed that religion is how you believe and
how you live your life. It doesn’t matter what other people say you
should do or how you should believe.. It’s whether or not you believe
you are serving your Lord in the right way.
I’m adventurous, spontaneous, rebellious, a risk taker, a little wild,
a
little naughty, but I’m also caring, loving (to the right woman).,
sincere, open-minded, not bashful. I’m pretty loyal and I try to be
extremely honest.
I’m waiting right now to hear something about my case. My Rule 32
Appeal is getting started right now. An investigator is supposed to
be appointed and I’m waiting on some important evidence to be
checked out. I’m waiting for the attorney and the investigator to
come up to visit. Hopefully real soon. I truly believe I can win a new
trial with my Rule 32 Appeal. A few times since July the newspapers
have run articles on my situation. Most recently was 10/12/01. So
far the articles have been pretty fair about telling my side of the
story. If you would like, I’ll send you a copy of the most recent
articles to post. Let me know.
As far as the address of yours, I didn’t realize that you were the
only one doing STS and the PO Box was yours alone. I wasn’t sure
who all would get my letters to you. That’s why I was asking.
Well, I guess I’d better go for now. I hope to hear from you again
soon.
Utmost respect,
Robert
11/27/01
Dear Traci,
Hello again. It was a nice surprise to receive your letter tonight. I
was thinking about you yesterday, wondering when I’d hear from you
since it had been almost a month since I wrote you. I hope all is well
with you and your family. That y’all are in the best of health. Things
are pretty much the same around here. Just another day.
What all have you been up to lately? Has anything interesting been
going on around there? So far nothing has happened in my case and
I’m waiting for my R-32 Appeal to be submitted to the courts. Then
it’ll be up to the judge to make his decision on the information given
to him. I believe the decision will come out in my favor.
I’m waiting for my attorney to visit me. He should in the near future.
An investigator is supposed to be finding some important information
right now that will prove that I was lied upon. As soon as the
investigator is done I should be able to prove everything I’ve been
saying. That the prosecutor and detective lied on me to the judge
and jury.
Yeah, I am fair skinned and I burn quite easy. I’ve never been one to
hang out in the sun anyway. I really don’t like the sun and have
always preferred the nights.
The kids of today surprise me a lot. The disrespect they show to
themselves and everyone else is beyond belief. I can’t believe how
they talk either. Kids today seem to believe that there is nothing
they don’t know and that they are the baddest, meanest, toughest
to every walk on this earth. Which is ridiculous. I am a 32 year old
man who has lived through more than I have veer wanted to and
hope the kids never know it all. Kids really need an education (a
really good one) in order to make it in these times. McDonald’s and
Jack in the Box is not the finer things in life. And the criminal side
is
nothing but a one way ticket to prison; maybe death row.
The biggest advice I could give a kid today is get the best education
possible. Stay away from the criminal activities, it’s just not worth it.
Never being able to hold another person, hug your family or even
take a walk by yourself. Locked in a small cell seven days a week
with nothing but concrete steel to look at. It’s no kind of life at all.
Yeah, I can understand a lot of people have asked you for money
but I decided when I first started looking for pen pals that I wasn’t
going to use anyone. I do need help but I want people to help me
because they want to. Not because I asked. And no, I would never
just quit writing because you couldn’t help. That wouldn’t be right. I
don’t have much left in this life left that is my own except for my
word and my respect. And I’m not going to break that. If that means
I have to continue doing without because I won’t play stupid games
then so be it. I’d rather just continue doing without.
Well, they are about to pick up the mail so I guess I’d better go for
now. I hope to hear from you again real soon.
Utmost respect,
Robert
01/01/02
Happy New Year!
Dear Traci,
Hello again. It was a surprise to receive your letter last night. I hope
you and your family had a great Christmas and that 2002 is an
awesome year for y’all. I hope all is well with y’all and that y’all are
in
the best of health.
I do understand why it took you so long to respond to my letter. I’m
sure that you are extremely busy in your life and that the holidays
didn’t help much, but I was sure if I was patient, I’d hear from you
whenever you got the time to respond. Sounds like you could use a
vacation just to get away for a while. I hope you are able to rest
and relax in the near future.
Even though Christmas is my birthday, it had never really been my
favorite holiday. When I was a kid my family hardly did the
decorating and all of the other things that would normally be thought
of for Christmas. I bet you had a fun time going all out as you put it.
Right after Thanksgiving you start your decorating? Why a month
before Christmas? Sounds like you have a lot of decorations. Was
everything pretty hectic with the kids out of school? I bet you’ll be
glad when they start again.
Things are a bummer in here during the holidays, but it’s something
we have to learn to deal with. When I get down I just prefer to be
left alone by everyone. I live around. Since my mom died I don’t
have any family that I have any contact with. I don’t have visits so
that’s just another thing that gets me down. Most of the time I just
try and not to think about it.
No, so far I still haven’t heard anything about my appeals. I’m having
trouble with the attorney right now; I have written him about five
letters and he hasn’t responded to my questions. I did a lot of
studying and preparation for this appeal for the attorney. And the
attorney has repeatedly not let me know what’s going on with my
case. I’m worried about whether or not he’s going to do a good job
on my appeal. If he doesn’t do a very good job, when he’s finished
he just moved on to another case. But if he doesn’t do a very good
job, I am one step closer to my execution. When I first met him, he
made a bunch of promises about keeping in touch but I don’t have
anybody out there to help me. I’m locked up in a small cell and my
letters to him do no good because he doesn’t bother to respond to
them.
Anyway that subject is depressing me so I’m going to change it. Oh
yeah, I did have an extra copy of the bar complaint but I ended up
having to USE IT. As soon as I can get another copy of it and some
money, I will send it to you for you to read. I can’t believe the way
that the kids of today act and talk to everyone, their parents
included. If I had ever even started to speak to my parents like that
I would have had my teeth knocked down my throat. The lids of
today have no respect. Fighting, killing, drinking, drugs, dropping out
of school, babies having babies, etc…seems to be normal for the kids
of today.
They don’t seem to understand or care that they are destroying
their lives. Maybe these kids that think they are bad and tough
should have to watch a man be executed. Watch a man be tied
down and watch how their state takes a man’s life. See how that
affects them. Let them see that they are not as bad and tough as
they think they are. I agree, our way of life and raising kids in our
homes has changed to be so dysfunctional over the years that it’s
no wonder the kids of today are the way they are. I think our whole
lifestyle of today needs to be looked at and changed. Not just within
the family but within everything. How can kids of today learn good
values when most around them have none?
Well, I was glad to hear from you. I hope when this letter reaches
you that things are going good in your life.
Until next time.
Utmost respect,
Robert
02/18/02
Traci, Hello
Got your letter. Thank you for replying. No problem on taking so
long, I do realize you are extremely busy. I hope all is well with you
and your family, that ya’ll are in the best of health. What all have
you been up to lately? How have you been doing? How have you
been feeling? I hope you’ve been in a real good mood.
It sounds like you did get a lot of packages and extreme amounts of
mail. That sux that Stormy took a job and didn’t even start to assist
you. You’ve got to be overloaded doing all of this by yourself. That’s
pretty cool that you have started your video series. It sounds like
something you are really getting into and really enjoying doing. I
hope that you help a lot of kids with everything you are doing. I
hope you are able to find someone real soon who is willing to help
you with everything you are doing.
Yeah, things finally got a little better as far as my attorney goes? I
finally got mad because I wasn’t hearing from him or being told
anything. I sent them a couple of letters griping at them and finally
was contacted. As a matter of fact my Rule 32 appeal was
submitted to the courts on Feb. 15th. Now the A.G.’s office files
their reply to make his decision. I’m not sure how long that will take,
4 to 6 months maybe. We’ll see. I was thinking of sending you my
Rule 32 to put up for your people to read, maybe I will. Well, I guess
I’d better close this up for now. I hope things have slowed down for
you. Take care.
Utmost respect,
Robert
Robert Glen Jones Jr. 70566 / 3G-21
Arizona State Prison - Florence - Eyman
SMU II - Death Row
PO Box 3400
Florence Arizona 85232 USA
| Return to Robert Glen Jones Homepage |
