Taken from Lamp of Hope: http://www.lampofhope.org/az70566.html

After the Darkest of Days the sun shines again
           I know that day will come
       Through Sorrow's tears
           Serenity will come in time.
       The greatest beauty
           The greatest pleasure
           How beautiful that you are
       Wishing you strength for today
           Hope for tomorrow.

       Is it so small a thing to have enjoyed the sun?
           Lived in the light in the Spring?
       To have Loved?
           To have Thought?
           To have Done?

       Find peace in the hope of a sweeter tomorrow

       The Flowers will always bloom
           The sun will always shine,
           And the rainbow will
           Always follow the
               Storm….

       My name is Robert Glen Jones Jr. This letter is very
       important to me and I ask you to please take the time to read it. As
       you are reading this I am sitting on Death Row in Florence,
       Arizona, fighting to save my life. While you are reading this I ask
       you to think about three questions:

       #1. What are your beliefs on the death penalty?
       #2. Do you feel that a man should be executed for a crime he did
       not commit?
       #3. Do you feel that the Prosecutors and Detectives should be able
       to get away with all the LIES and MISCONDUCT that they want
       to just to get their conviction?

       I can PROVE that False Evidence and False Testimony was used
       to convict me of a crime I didn't do/ I have Police Supplemental
       Records and prior Trial Testimony to PROVE that the Prosecutor
       of my case LIED to the Judge and Jury, committed Subordination
       of Perjury and led witnesses to give Implies Assertions… That the
       Lead Detective committed Perjury whilst testifying, and they both
       allowed a witness to commit Perjury while she testified. A “BAR
       COMPLAINT” was filed with the Arizona State Bar against the
       Prosecutor of my case because of his LIES and MISCONDUCT
       during my trial. Last night I received a letter from the Senior Bar
       Council for Arizona State Bar stating “It was determined that
       probably cause exists for the filing of a formal complaint against
       David White by the State Bar.”

       The FBI was also contacted concerning the Prosecutors
       MISCONDUCT. An investigation into this matter was requested
       and is even now going on. Already another Prosecutor out of the
       County Attorney's Office (as in my case) and a different Lead
       Detective has been reprimanded because of the same type of
       MISCONDUCT as was done at my trial. Is this normal practice
       for this County Attorney's Office? Two Prosecutors out of the
       same office involved in MISCONDUCT!

       I need your help to save my life! I cannot do this alone! I have
       paperwork to PROVE the MISCONDUCT committed by the
       Prosecutor and Detectives. I believe I can win a new trial if I have
       a good attorney to fight for me. I do not have the funds to pay the
       fees of a good attorney and these other people that I desperately
       need! I do not want to be executed for a crime I had NO part in. I
       am asking for help in this fight to save my life!!!

       A little personal information about myself. I am 31 (12-25-69),
       5'11, and 159lbs. I am originally from Northwest Texas. I like
       most kinds of music. I like to go hiking, camping, hunting and
       fishing. I love to ride motorcycles and enjoy 4-wheeling. I like to
       go dancing and enjoy shooting pool. I also enjoy working out. I am
       very straight forward and not into stupid head games. I like writing
       and I love to read, which is how I spend most of my time in here. I
       am locked in a small cell 7 days a week except for only 4 and a
       half hours for showers and such. Friends of any age, 18 and above,
       who will look beyond where I am at and take a chance on the man
       insider these concrete walls. If you are at all interested in my fight
       to save my life after reading this then please feel free to contact me.
       I ask you not to just ignore my letter but to show it to others for
       them to read also. Any and all interest to help me stop from being
       EXECUTED is greatly appreciated and desperately needed!
       Thank you for your time and consideration. I hope to hear from
       you in the near future.

       Until Then

       Sincerely
       Robert Glen Jones Jr.
       #70566 #3G21
       Arizona State Prison – Eyman
       PO Box 3400 SMU II
       Florence
       Arizona 85232

       SUBORNATION OF PERJURY: The offence of procuring
       another to take such false oath as would constitute PERJURY in
       the principal.

       PERJURY: A false statement knowingly made in court.

       IMPLIED ASERTIONS: Statements which, while not expressed
       may be deduced from what is written or spoken.

       CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME SAVE MY LIFE??????

       I need help to save my life. I cannot do this alone. I beg you to
       please take the time to read my 'information letter' that I've written
       about my situation. The address is:   http://ccadp.org/robertglenjones.htm

A Man’s Fight for Justice...
                            The case of Robert Glen Jones, Arizona
 
 

I was arrested on the crimes of the Moon Smoke Shop and Fire Fighter
Union Hall murders in Tucson, Arizona.  I was found "Guilty" and
sentenced to Death in 1998.
Now I am on Death Row in Florence, AZ.
Now I need the best attorney possible who is willing to take a chance and
help me fight to save my life from a crime I did not commit.
 

This case was extremely 'High Profile' and voted the "Number 5" news event of 1996 by local
papers.  Approximately 850 print or television articles regarding this case.  The prosecutors were
desperate for a conviction.  At the beginning, the case was based on one man, David Nordstrom.

          In July of 1997 during the grand jury process, a juror asked Det. Salgado;
            "So all were basing this on is the statements of Mr. Nordstrom?"
                               And Det. Salgado,
 "Robert Jones had a vehicle similar to the suspects vehicle.  Other witnesses who knew both
 David Nordstrom and Robert Jones, stating Jones always wore the cowboy hat, the western
    wear, and liked to wear sunglasses.  And once the composites came out, Robert Jones
                 immediately stopped wearing that type of clothing."

NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE!  What he did not tell the Grand Jury was that during these months I
was riding a motorcycle.  Hard to ride a motorcycle wearing a cowboy hat.  Wouldn't you think?

Now, David Nordstrom entered a 'Plea' because the prosecutor was about to lose a motion filed by
Mr. Nordstrom's attorney to have all of his prior statements to the police "Suppressed," because of
the detectives' very unscrupulous misconduct.  The prosecutor knew that once this happened he had
absolutely nothing to convict anyone with.  Including David Nordstrom!  Mr. Nordstrom had already
told the prosecutor where to stick his first plea offer of 2-twenty year sentences.  Throughout David
Nordstrom's tape-recorded statements, he was caught lying numerous times and continued to be
caught lying all the way through his second arrest statements.  When detectives would question him
on his lying, he would then change his story.  Only then would he change it!  This is defined in the
Webster's Dictionary as "Lying," not as the detectives and prosecutors put it.  "He was just giving
more information."  Yeah right!  Its called "Lying"!  The detectives know he was lying so they have
him take a polygraph test.  The reasons are obvious for whoever reads his statements and David
Nordstrom of course failed the polygraph.

By the time I got to trial, the Prosecution Team had three main witnesses they used to convict me.
David Nordstrom, the prosecutions key witness.  Lana Irwin, also important and plus used to
corroborate David Nordstrom.  And David Evans, who up to the beginning of 1997 was telling his
girlfriend he did not believe I committed these crimes.  Then the detectives started talking to him.

The information in my case is hard to explain and to understand unless you take the time to read it
all.  Then you would see the 'Gross Injustice' done to me!  The basic fact is I was 'Railroaded' by the
Prosecution Team to protect their key witness, David Nordstrom, and to get their conviction.

Prosecutorial Misconduct, Detective Misconduct, Implied Assertions, Subornation of Perjury and
Perjury itself, all committed by the 'Key' players of the Prosecution Team.  These powerful
allegations can be proven the truth.  Prosecutor David White lied to the Jury in stating information in
his opening and closing statements, that he knew to be false.  Through witnesses by Implied
Assertions he corroborated a witness he knew was lying and giving false information to the Jury.
David White lied to the Judge during my trial at a sidebar.  Lana Irwin's entire testimony was
Perjury.  Det. Brenda Woolridge committed Perjury while testifying on the stand.  Her and Det.
Salgado both lied to my trial attorney during a Defense Interview before my trial.  Of course David
Nordstrom's continuous lying throughout all of this and the fact that David Nordstrom wrote notes
(proven to be his handwriting) trying to get another inmate to beat him up so he could "Sue" the
county.  In addition, the fact he was trying to get this same inmate to kidnap his girlfriend and her
children so he could make it look like we sent him after them.

I did not have a telephone at my home until the middle of June 1996.  Up to that point, I used one of
two pay phones in my complex or one of three pay phones at the Circle K near my home. On May
30th, 1996 at 6:14 p.m. a 911 call was placed about a robbery/murder in progress.  By David
Nordstrom's story around 6:30 p.m., himself, his brother Scott Nordstrom, and I are driving south
on the freeway (out on the other side of town from where I lived) on the way to take him home.  By
phone records of a cellular phone Scott Nordstrom carried all of the time, a call was made at 6:24
p.m. to the payphone I used a lot at the Circle K (520-298-9516) near my home.
David Whites theory is I must have been calling Chris Lee, an 'ex' roommate of mine.  Which is not
possible because Chris Lee did not move in with me until 'after' the first of June!
I believe this can be proven!  So, if Chris Lee can be proven not to have been living with me at this
time and I am suppose to be driving down the freeway with the Nordstrom brothers, then why is
Scott Nordstrom's cellular phone being used to call the pay phone by my home that I used a lot?  It
is my belief that I was being called.

I have Disclosures, Police Supplemental Reports, and Trial Testimony to prove just about everything
I have written.  Some investigating I believe will Prove the rest!
If I had a good Attorney, I would not be sitting here on Death Row right now.  The saying "money
talks," is a sad fact of reality, but it is a reality, none the less!  I do not have the money to adequately
defend myself, so I am begging for help, to save my life!  I have been told that, for an Attorney
whom fights for what he/she believes in, my case is an "Attorneys Dream Case."  I do not want to
sound arrogant, far from it, I am sacred to death.  I am an innocent man, sitting on Death Row,
because of Prosecutorial Misconduct, Detectives Misconduct, Implied Assertions, Subornation of
Perjury, and Perjury itself.  I am not sure what else a Good Attorney could find.  I know nothing
about the Law and I found these things!  So, what could be found by an Attorney who really knows
what they are doing?

I would like to Thank You in advance for any help with my defense, any advice you may be willing
to give me, or any donations to offer for my defense, only used to help save my life.  Any and all help
would be greatly appreciated!
If this, 'any of this', is of interest to you, Please feel free to contact me.  I am looking forward to
hearing from you...

Sincerely,
Robert Glen Jones Jr.

For More Information
Robert Glen Jones Jr.
#70566   3G-21
Arizona State Prison - Florence - Eyman
SMU II - Death Row
P. O. Box 3400
Florence, Arizona 85232
USA

David White, in his 'Opening Statement' lied to the Jury:
"And there are doors here, this is a bathroom and this is a closet.  One of these doors has been kicked
in.  Apparently the 'Shooter' kicked in the door, ordered Tom Hardman to come out, lay on the ground,
then executed him, two shots." This is what he says 'Noel Engles' sees when he runs into the back
room and out the rear door of the Moon Smoke Shop.

Further, on into his statement, concerning what 'Lana Irwin' will testify to, he says:
"One of the places, the door was kicked open to get to the victim," then, "Somebody having
a door kicked open."

Now, the very first witness, 'Noel Engles,' into my trial he corroborates 'Lana Irwin' by Implied
Assertions:
Q:  "To your knowledge, were any of those doors broken or smashed, or any thing like that, prior to this
date?"
A:  "I don't think so!"

A later witness, Detective Joseph Godoy, through Implied Assertions, also corroborated 'Lana
Irwin' mentioned above:
Q:  "Did you find any damage to one of those doors in the back room?"
A:   "Yes!"
Q:  (States 15 & 16) "Do those represent a door that you saw, that was damaged?"
A:  "Yes!"

Now, corroborated 'Lana Irwin,' in her trial testimony, discussing overhearing me (supposedly)
talk about 'Acts of Violence' in Tucson.  David White is asking her questions in Subornation of
Perjury:
Q:   "Do you remember hearing any conversation about doors?"
A:   "One door was open, and one had to be kicked in!"
Q:   "I'm sorry, One 'had' to be kicked in?"
A:   "YES!  One was kicked.  One was open!"

There are many other things this woman says, that can be 'PROVEN' false, by records.  Also
corroborating 'Lana Irwin', David White is now on 'Direct' with Detective Brenda Woolridge.
Here, David White in 'Subornation of Perjury' and Detective Woolridge in 'Perjury', say:

Q:   "Did Lana Irwin tell you something about a door being kicked in?"
A:   "YES, she did!"
Q:   "Was there, a door kicked in, in one of these cases?"
A:   "YES, in the back room, at the Smoke Shop."
Q:   "As shown in 'States 50?"
A:   "YES, it is!"
Q:   "The fact that a door was kicked in, was that ever mentioned at the other trial, concerning this
case?"
A:   "NO, it was not!"

In David Whites 'Closing Arguments', he is corroborating 'Lana Irwin', while "LYING" to the
Jury, when he says:
"She overhears the defendant saying a door had to be kicked in.  Remember that?
And we have a door kicked in.  We have a photograph, one of these doors, this one right here, 58, was
kicked in.  Now ladies and gentlemen, that particular fact wasn't even brought out at the trial of the other
guy, Scott Nordstrom. That didn't come out at the trial and yet Lana Irwin tells you she over heard this
defendant telling Coats, "the one door had to be kicked in," and sure enough."

Then later David White says:
"Scott Nordstrom chased Tom Hardman to the back room, where to gets him out of the door, lays him
on the ground and executes him."

This is all very important!  This is all used to corroborate Lana Irwin to make the Jury believe she is
a truthful, important witness.  She is also used to corroborate David Nordstrom, that I must have
been the one to commit these murders, not David Nordstrom.  Because how else would she have
known these things unless I was there and she overheard me talking about them.  That's the
Prosecution Teams theory!  Very important!  For one simple reason!  I was set up to protect David
Nordstrom.  The Prosecutions key witness!  What do I mean?  I mean, there was No other
evidence against me except David Nordstrom and the State used false testimony/evidence against
me to get their conviction.  And this can be proven through Police Supplemental Reports and prior
Trial Testimony at Scott Nordstrom's trial.  Supplemental Reports done by Sgt. Grimshaw #3964
and Officer Charvoz #27144 who both say that Sgt. Grimshaw told Officer Charvoz to kick in this
door.  Which he did, in the Moon Smoke Shop at 6:32 p.m., 16 to 18 minutes after the murderers
had left.

Det. Joseph Godoy at Scott Nordstrom's trial testified with David White on 'Direct':
Pg. 200 - Lines 6-7
A:  "Then we broke down the door; Actually broke down the door."
Lines 10-11
Q:  "The door that had to be kicked into, uniform officers did that?"
A:  "Yes!"
Lines 13-14
Q:  The intruders didn't do that?"
A:  "No!"  "They Did Not!

All of this shows that David White lied to the Jury during his Opening Statements, leads witnesses to
give Implied Assertions, committed Subornation of Perjury of Lana Irwin and Det. Brenda Woolridge, both
of which committed Perjury while on the stand testifying.  In addition, David White lied again in his
Closing Arguments.  We can prove this to be fact because David White, Det. Woolridge and Det.
Salgado were in the court room when Det. Godoy testified in Scott Nordstrom's trial that Police are the
ones who in fact, kicked in the door at the Moon Smoke Shop.
Not the intruders!  They knew and had Lana Irwin give False Testimony!

All of this clearly shows Lana Irwin Never overheard Any conversations by me.  The important question is
'How did she get the information she testified to?'  I believe the Detectives!  If David White is willing to Lie
to the Judge, Lie to the Jury and commit Subornation of Perjury, Det. Brenda Woolridge is willing to
commit Perjury and they are willing to allow Lana Irwin to commit Perjury, then...What else are they
willing to do to get their conviction?  How far are they willing to go?  Those are the questions!

Lies, Manipulation, Connive, Deceit, Trickery, and Cunningness! This is Only the beginning!

- information provided by Robert Glen Jones -
 

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT...

                         #1. What are your beliefs on the death penalty?
                         #2. Do you feel that a man should be executed for a crime that he
                         did not commit?
                         #3. Do you feel that the Prosecutors and Detectives should be able
                         to get away with all the LIES and MISCONDUCT they want to just
                         get their conviction?

                         I can PROVE that False Evidence and False Testimony was used to
                         convict me of a crime I didn't do. I have Police Supplemental Reports
                         and prior Trial Testimony to PROVE that the Prosecutor of my case
                         LIED to the Judge and jury, committed Subornation of Perjury and
                         led witnesses to give Implied Assertions... That the Lead Detective
                         committed Perjury while testifying and they both allowed a witness
                         to commit Perjury while she testified. A “BAR COMPLAINT” was filed
                         with the Arizona State Bar against the Prosecutor of my case
                         because of his LIES and MISCONDUCT during my trial. Last night I
                         received a letter from the Senior Bar Counsel for the Arizona State
                         Bar stating "It was determined that probable cause exists for the
                         filing of a formal complaint against David White by the State Bar."

                         The FBI was also contacted concerning the prosecutors
                         MISCONDUCT. An investigation into this matter was requested and is
                         even now going on. Already another Prosecutor out of the County
                         Attorneys Office (as in my case) and a different Lead Detective has
                         been reprimanded because of the same type of MISCONDUCT as was
                         done at my trial. Is this normal practice for this County Attorney’s
                         office? Two Prosecutors out of the same office involved in
                         MISCONDUCT!

                         I need help to save my life! I cannot do this alone! I have the
                         paperwork to PROVE the MISCONDUCT committed by the Prosecutor
                         and Detectives. I believe I can win a new trial if I have a good
                         attorney to fight for me. I do not have the funds to pay the fees of
                         a good attorney and these other people that I desperately need! I
                         do not want to be executed for a crime I had NO part in. I am asking
                         for help in this fight to save my life!!
                         A little personal information about myself. I am 31 (12-25-69), 5' 11,
                         and 159 tbs. I am originally from Northeast Texas. I like most kinds
                         of music. I like to go hiking, camping, hunting and fishing. I love to
                         ride motorcycles and enjoy 4-wheeling. I like to go dancing and
                         enjoy shooting pool. I also enjoy working out. I am very straight
                         forward and not into stupid head games. I like writing and I love to
                         read, which is how I spend most of my time in here. I am locked in a
                         small cell 7 days a week except for only 41/2 hours for showers and
                         such. Any correspondence to take away these lonely hours would be
                         GREAT. Friends of any age, 18 and above, who will look beyond
                         where I am at and take a chance on the man inside these concrete
                         walls. If you are at all interested in my fight to save my life after
                         reading this please feel free to contact me. I ask you not to just
                         ignore my letter but to show it to others for them to read also_ Any
                         and all interest to help me stop from being EXECUTED is greatly
                         appreciated and desperately needed!

                         Thank you for your time and consideration. I hope to hear from you
                         in the near future.

                         Until Then,

                         Sincerely,

                         Robert Glen Jones Jr.
 

                         SUBORNATION OF PERJURY: The offense of procuring another to
                         take such a false oath as would constitute PERJURY in the principal.

                         PERJURY: A false statement knowingly made in a proceeding in a
                         court.

                         IMPLIED ASSERTIONS: Statements which, while not expressed may
                         be deduced from
                         What is written or spoken.

                         CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME SAVE MY LIFE????????
 
 
                         8/22/01
 
                         Dear Traci,
 
                         Hello again.  I t was nice to receive your letter tonight.  Thank you
                         for responding and putting up the materials I sent.  I hope that all is
                         well with you and yours.  That y’all are in the best of health.  I do
                         understand why it took you so long to write back.  It’s okay and I’m
                         pretty sure you are extremely busy.  Sounds like a lot of people have
                         written you, other inmates, over the last month.
 
                         I would never disrespect you by sending you anything distasteful to
                         post.  I don’t believe that would be right.
 
                         I am going to enclose a copy of the information letter that I have
                         written concerning my situation.  Everything that I have written is
                         the truth and can be proven with paperwork here in my cell.  Life in
                         here is bad especially if you have nobody out there who cares.
                         When my mom died in October of ’99 I lost everything I had out
                         there.  I no longer have any help.
 
                         It would be great if what you post gains me even a little interest in
                         my situation.  Thank you for your efforts and what you are doing.
 
                         Don’t worry about whatever the problem is with the NBCi from
                         CAADP.  I’m not sure what the problem is but apparently it’s been
                         happening for quite awhile.  I’ve given up on it being there.
 
                         With what I am sending you now you will have all the up to date
                         information.  I would like you r opinion of what I have written after
                         you read it.
 
                         You have a great heart it seems.  I’m not sure of you are interested
                         in writing as friends, with all the others writing also. ,   I am going to
                         cut this short.
 
                         Until next time,
                         Utmost respect,
 
                         Robert

                         My name is Robert Glen Jones Jr and I beg of you to PLEASE take
                         the time to read this information...

                         State of Arizona vs. Robert Glen Jones Jr.
                         No. CR?98?0537?AP
                         Pima County No CR?57526

                         I was arrested on the crimes of the Moon Smoke Shop and Fire
                         Fighter Union Hall murders in Tucson, Arizona. I was found guilty and
                         sentenced to death in 1998. Now I am on death row in Florence,
                         Arizona. My first appeal, my 'Direct Appeal' was denied as I found
                         out yesterday by someone who heard the TV announcing the courts
                         decision. Now I need the best attorney possible who is willing to
                         take a chance and help me fight to save my life from a crime I did
                         not commit.

                         ?The Prosecution Team-
                         Prosecutor David White, Detective Brenda Woolridge, Detective Ed
                         Salgado

                         This case was extremely "High Profile" and voted the "Number 5
                         News Event of 1996" by local papers. There were approximately 850
                         print or television articles regarding this case. The prosecutors were
                         desperate for a conviction. At the beginning the case was based on
                         one man, David Nordstrom. In July of 1997 during the Grand Jury
                         process, a juror asked Detective Salgado, "So all were basing this on
                         is the statements of Mr. Nordstrom?" And Detective Salgada
                         answered, "Robert Jones had a vehicle similar to the suspects
                         vehicle. Other witnesses who knew both David Nordstrom and Robert
                         Jones, stating Robert Jones always wore the cowboy hat, the
                         western wear and liked to wear sunglasses. And once the
                         composites came out, Robert Jones immediately stopped wearing
                         that type of clothing.

                         NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE!!

                         What he did not tell the Grand Jury was that during these months I
                         was riding a motorcycle. Hard to ride a motorcycle wearing a cowboy
                         hat, wouldn't you think?

                         Now David Nordstrom entered a PLEA because the Prosecutor was
                         about to lose a "motion" filed by Mr. Nordstrom's attorney to have all
                         of his prior statements to the police "suppressed" because of the
                         detectives Very Unscrupulous Misconduct. The prosecutor knew that
                         once this happened he had absolutely nothing to convict anyone
                         with, including David Nordstrom! Mr. Nordstrom had already turned
                         down the prosecutor's first "plea" offer of two twenty?year
                         sentences. Throughout David Nordstrom's tape?recorded statements
                         he was caught lying numerous times and continued to be caught
                         lying all the way through his "Second Arrest" statement. When
                         detectives would question him on his lying, only then would he
                         change his story! This is defined in the Webster's dictionary as
                         LYING! Not as the detectives and prosecutors put it.." He was just
                         giving more information" Yeah Right! It's called lying! The detectives
                         know he was lying so they have him take a polygraph test. The
                         reasons are obvious for whoever reads his statements. And David
                         Nordstrom of course FAILED THE POLYGRAPH!!

                         By the time I got to trial, the prosecution team had three main
                         witnesses they used to

                         convict me. David Nordstrom, the prosecutions key witness, Lana
                         Irwin, also important and plus used to corroborate David Nordstrom
                         and David Evans, who up to the beginning of 1997 was telling his
                         girlfiiend that he did not believe I committed these crimes. Then the
                         detectives started talking to him!

                         The information in my case is hard to explain and to understand
                         unless you take the time to read it all. Then you would see the
                         "gross injustice done to me!" The basic fact is I was "railroaded" by
                         the prosecution team to protect their key witness, David Nordstrom,
                         and to get their conviction. Prosecutorial Misconduct, Detectives
                         Misconduct, Implied Assertions, Subornation of Perjury and Perjury
                         itself. All committed by the "key" players of the prosecution team.
                         These powerful allegations can be proven the truth! Prosecutor
                         David White lied to the jury in stating information in his Opening And
                         Closing Statements that he knew to be false. Through witnesses by
                         Implied Assertions he corroborated a witness he knew was lying and
                         giving false information to the jury. David White lied to the Judge
                         during my trial at a "sidebar". Lana Irwin' s entire testimony was
                         Perjury. Detective Brenda Woolridge committed Perjury while
                         testifying on the stand. Detective Woolridge and Detective Salgado
                         both LIED to my trial attorney during a defense interview before my
                         trial. Of course David Nordstroms' continuous lying throughout all of
                         this and the fact that David Nordstrom wrote notes (proven to be
                         his handwriting) trying to get another inmate to beat him up so he
                         could "sue" the county. In addition, the fact he was trying to get
                         this same inmate to kidnap his girlftiend and her children so he could
                         make it look like we sent him after them.

                         David Nordstrom's Complete Manipulations!

                         I did not have a telephone at my home until the middle of June 1996.
                         Up to that point I used one of two pay phones in my complex or one
                         of three pay phones at the Circle K near my home. On May 30th,
                         1996 at 6:14 pm a 911 call was placed about a robbery/murders in
                         progress. By David Nordstrom's story around 6:30 pm himself, his
                         brother Scott Nordstrom and I are driving south on the freeway (out
                         on the other side of town from where I lived) on the way to take him
                         home. By phone records of a cellular phone Scott Nordstrom carried
                         all of the time, a call was made at 6:24 pm to the pay phones I used
                         a lot at the Circle K (520?298?9516) near my home. David White's
                         theory is I must have been calling Chris Lee, an ex?roommate of
                         mine. Which is not possible because Chris Lee did not move in with
                         me until after the first of June. I believe this can be proven! So, if
                         Chris Lee can be proven not to have been living with me at this time
                         and I am supposed to be driving down the freeway with the
                         Nordstrom brothers then why is Scott Nordstroms cellular phone
                         being used to call the pay phones by my home that I used a lot. It is
                         my belief that I was being called.

                         I have Disclosures, Police Supplemental Reports and Trial Testimony
                         to PROVE just about everything that I have written. Some
                         investigating I believe will PROVE the rest! The things I have written
                         on pages A? I to A?4 are in no way harmless error! This was all major
                         evidence used against me at my trial, which can be all proven
                         Perjury.

                         If I had a good attorney I would not be sitting here on Death Row
                         right now. The saying "money talks" is a sad fact of reality, but it is
                         reality none the less. I do not have the money to adequately defend
                         myself so I am begging for help to save my life. I am scared to
                         death. I am an innocent man sitting on death row because of Lies
                         and Misconduct committed by the prosecution team. I know nothing
                         about the law and I found issues of Prosecutorial Misconduct,
                         Detectives Misconduct, Implied Assertions, Subordination of Perjury
                         and Perjury itself. What could be found by a good attorney who
                         really knows what he or she is doing?

                         I do not know whether or not the Nordstrom brothers were involved
                         in these crimes. All I do know is that I was not involved and I am not
                         going to make up lies, like many others in this case, just to save
                         myself. I feel that because I would not make a statement about
                         crimes I knew nothing about that I was set up and railroaded by the
                         prosecution team to get their conviction. Now I am fighting to save
                         my life for crimes I did not commit. I had NO personal knowledge of
                         these crimes and have to use paperwork that was disclosed to me
                         through my trial attorney by the County Attorney's Office. I relied
                         completely upon my attorney the first time through all of this and
                         really didn't get involved because I knew nothing about the law. I
                         figured he was my attorney so let him do his job, MISTAKE!! I believe
                         that with a good attorney and some investigating I will be able to
                         PROVE my innocence.

                         According to a study recently conducted by New York's Columbia
                         University Law School and based on a review of 4,600 cases from
                         1973 to 1995, it seems that serious errors occur in nearly 70 percent
                         of all trials leading to the death penalty. Researchers found serious
                         errors, suppressed evidence, judge's mistakes, and jury bias in 68 of
                         every 100 cases. The incentives are to generate a lot of death
                         sentences, even ones that don't belong there, even ones that you
                         have to cut comers to get there and let someone else worry about it
                         over the next 9 years, 10 years to see what happens. Efforts to
                         make changes to the capitol punishment system at the state and
                         federal levels are under way with a handful of state legislatures
                         re?examining the death penalty practices. This study also found that
                         incompetent counsel is to blame for many of the errors in death
                         penalty cases. Thirty seven percent of all the errors that are being
                         found in this system are because of lawyers that are so bad that
                         you can actually prove that the outcome would have been different
                         if you had a better lawyer. Two out of three convictions were
                         overturned on appeal, mostly because of serious errors by
                         incompetent defense lawyers or overzealous police and prosecutors
                         who withheld evidence. Seventy five percent of the people whose
                         death sentences were set aside were later given lesser sentences
                         after retrial, in plea bargains or by order of a Judge. Another seven
                         percent were found innocent on retrial. Eighteen percent were given
                         the death penalty on retrial, but many of these had their convictions
                         overturned again in the appeals process.

                         Closer to home here in Arizona, the study released by Columbia
                         University says that Arizona ranks second in nation in the number of
                         death sentences it imposes per capita, but it also reports that nearly
                         eighty percent of those convictions were overturned. Those
                         conclusions call for "A very close and serious look" at Arizona's court
                         system says James A. Liebman, the Law Professor and former
                         defense attorney who led the study. Others refer to the increasing
                         number of death row inmates who are released after their
                         convictions are overturned. Eighty?five death row inmates have
                         been released, including eight here in Arizona. The Pima County
                         Attorneys office in Tucson, Arizona is already under investigation
                         because of Misconduct by one of their career prosecutors, a veteran
                         of at least twenty?five years. A prosecutor who supplied the leading
                         question, Subornation of Perjury to the Lead Detective. A detective
                         who admittedly supplied the false answer committed Perjury. The
                         newspaper quotes him as saying, "He lied because he was trying to
                         avoid jeopardizing a confidential informant." This excuse or
                         explanation appears to be "poppycock!" The US Supreme Court has
                         definitively detailed the lawful manner in which a police officer can
                         protect the identity of a confidential informant. Attorneys have been
                         refused the identity of an informant on these legal grounds and
                         Judges readily grant this protection to the prosecutors and the
                         police. So this explanation doesn't make sense or should I really say
                         EXCUSE? This does not in anyway justify his Perjury!

                         Now a second prosecutor, from the Pima County Attorneys Office, in
                         my case is also guilty of the same type of misconduct as the one
                         mentioned before. Is this normal practice for this County Attorney's
                         Office? A "bar complaint" has been filed with the Arizona State Bar
                         against David White because of his LIES and MISCONDUCT during my
                         trial. An investigation into this matter has been requested, because I
                         have Disclosure and prior Trial Testimony to PROVE that David White
                         committed Pedury and Subornation of Perjury. And the two lead
                         Homicide Detectives both committed Perjuries while testifying. If the
                         prosecution teams case against me was "so strong" as they said it
                         was, then why did they themselves have to LIE to the judge and
                         jury? Why did they have to use False Evidence and Testimony to get
                         a conviction? Because they knew I wasn't involved in these crimes.
                         They were desperate for a conviction and couldn't get it any other
                         way. Now I am asking for help to put right what was done to me in
                         the name of "so called" Justice!

                         What I am looking for is a good attorney, investigators, specialists,
                         experts, etc who are willing to help me fight to save my life. I can
                         not do this myself because access has been denied to us on
                         Arizona's Death Row to any law library material. Donations to help
                         pay the fees for these people whom I truly need would be GREATLY
                         APPRECIATED. I beg of you for any of the help that is desperately
                         needed. To send a donation for my defense fund, send any money
                         order, (no cash or checks) ... Please put my full name,
                         Robert Glen Jones Jr. # 70566 on the money order.

                         Any help will be great! More then I could ever explain in words!
                         Though I would like to thank you in advance for any help with my
                         defense, any advice you may be willing to give me or any donations
                         to offer for my defense to be ONLY used to help save my life.

                         If any of this is of interest to you PLEASE feel free to contact me. I
                         am looking forward to hearing from you in the near future. Please
                         read the examples that I have written on the following pages
                         showing exactly the type of Misconduct I mean.

                         For more information contact
                         Robert Glen Jones Jr. #70566 # 3G21
                         Arizona State Prison?Eyman
                         PO Box 3400 SMUII Florence, AZ 85230 U.S.A.

                         Utmost Respect,

                         Robert Glen Jones Jr.
 

                         A?1
                         David White in his Opening Statement immediately LIES to the jury,
                         "And there are doors here, this is a bathroom and this is a closet.
                         One of these doors has been kicked in. Apparently the shooter
                         kicked in the door, ordered Tom Hardman to come out and lay on the
                         ground and executed him, two shots."

                         This is what he says Noel Engles sees when he runs into the back
                         room and out the rear door of the Moon Smoke Shop. Further into
                         his Statement concerning what Lana Irwin will testify to he says;

                         "One of the places the door was kicked open to get to the victim."

                         Then, " Somebody having a door kicked open."

                         Now the very first witness, Noel Engles, into my trial he corroborates
                         Lana Irwin by Implied Assertions?,

                         Q: "To your knowledge were any of these doors broken or smashed
                         or anything like that prior to this date?"

                         A: "I don't think so."

                         A later witness, Detective Joseph Godoy, through Implied Assertions
                         also corroborated what Lana Irwin mentioned above;

                         Q: 'Did you find any damage to one of those doors in the back
                         room?"

                         A: "Yes"

                         Q: (States 15 & 16) 'Do those represent a door that you saw that
                         was damaged?"

                         A: "Yes"

                         Now corroborated Lana Irwin in her testimony discussing overhearing
                         me (supposedly) talk about "acts of violence" in Tucson. David White
                         is asking her questions in Subornation of Perjury;

                         Q: " Do you remember hearing any conversation about doors?"

                         A: "One door was open and one had to be kicked in."

                         Q: "I'm sorry, One had to be kicked in?"
 

                         A?2

                         A: “Yes, One was kicked, one was open."

                         There are many other things that Lana Irwin says that can be
                         PROVEN FALSE by records. Also corroborating Lana Irwin, David
                         White is now on Direct with Detective Brenda Woolridge. Here David
                         White in "Subornation of Perjury'' and Detective Woolridge in
                         "Perjury" say:

                         Q: “Did Lana Irwin tell you something about a door being kicked in?"

                         A: "Yes, she did. "

                         Q: "Was there a door kicked in in one of these cases?"

                         A: "Yes, in the backroom of the Smoke Shop."

                         Q: "As shown in States 50?"

                         A: "Yes, it is."

                         Q: "The fact that a door was kicked in, was that ever mentioned at
                         the other trial concerning the case?"

                         A: "No, it was not."

                         Now in David White's Closing Statements he is corroborating Lana
                         Irwin while LYING to the jury when he says; "She overhears the
                         defendant saying a door had to be kicked in. Remember that? And
                         we have a door kicked in. We have a photograph, one of these
                         doors, this one right here, 58, was kicked in. Now ladies and
                         gentlemen, that particular fact wasn't even brought out at the trial
                         of the other guy, Scott Nordstrom. That didn't come out at the trial
                         and yet Lana Irwin tells you she overheard this defendant telling
                         Coats, "the one door had to be kicked in." And sure enough. Then
                         later David White says; "Scott Nordstrom chased Tom Hardman to
                         the back room where he gets him out of the door and lays him on
                         the ground and executes him. ‘
 

                         A?3

                         This Is All Very Important!!

                         This is all used to corroborate Lana Irwin to make the jury believe
                         she is a truthful, important witness. She is also used to corroborate
                         David Nordstrom, that I must have been the one to commit these
                         murders. Not David Nordstrom, because how else would she have
                         known these things unless I was there and she overheard me talking
                         about them. That's the prosecution teams theory.

                         Very Important For One Simple Reason!!

                         I was set up to protect David Nordstrom, the prosecutions key
                         witness. What do I mean? I mean there was NO other evidence
                         against me except David Nordstrom and the State used False
                         Testimony/Evidence against me to get their conviction. And this can
                         be proven through Police Supplemental Reports and prior Trial
                         Testimony at Scott Nordstrom's trial. Supplemental reports done by
                         Sgt. Grimshaw #3964 and Officer Charvoz # 27144 who both say
                         that Sgt. Grimshaw told Officer Charvoz to kick in this door (which
                         he did) in the back room at the Moon Smoke Shop at 6:32 pm, 16 to
                         18 minutes after the murderers had left. Detective Joseph Godoy at
                         Scott Nordstrom's trial testified with David White on 'Direct";
                         Pg. 200 Lines 6?7.

                         A: "Then we broke down the door, Actually broke down the door ...”

                         Lines 10? 11

                         Q: "The door that had to be kicked in, uniform officers did that?"

                         A: "Yes"

                         Lines 13?14

                         Q: "The intruders didn't do that?"

                         A: "No! They did not!"
 

                         A?4

                         All of this shows that David White LIED to the jury during his opening
                         statements, leads witnesses to give Implied Assertions, committed
                         Subornation of Perjury of Lana Irwin and Detective Brenda Woolridge.
                         Both of which committed Perjury while on the stand testifying. In
                         addition, David White LIED again in his Closing Statements. We can
                         PROVE this to be fact because David White, Detective Woolridge and
                         Detective Salgado were in the courtroom when Detective Godoy
                         testified in Scott Nordstoms trial that Police Officers are the ones
                         who in fact kicked in the door at the Moon Smoke Shop. Not the
                         intruders! They knew and still had Lana Irwin give False Testimony!

                         All of this clearly shows Lana Irwin never overheard any
                         conversations by me. The important question is "How did she get the
                         information he testified to?" I believe the Detectives! If David White
                         is willing to LIE to the Judge, LIE to the Jury and commit Subornation
                         of Perjury, Detective Brenda Woolridge is willing to commit Perjury
                         and they are willing to allow Lana Irwin to commit Perjury then...
                         What else are they willing to do to get their conviction? How far are
                         they willing to go? Those are the questions!!

                         LIES! MANIPULATION! CONNIVE! DECEIT! TRICKERY! CUNNINGNESS!
                         THIS IS ONLY ThE BEGINNING!

                         My Direct Appeal was recently denied so now there is NO point in
                         keeping my information quiet about the willingness of the Prosecution
                         Team to lie to get their conviction. Because of my Rule 32,
                         everything will be brought out into the open. After reading this letter
                         if you are at all interested in contacting me, Please do. Also, if you
                         know of others who might be interested in any way, feel free to
                         send them a copy. Any help would be great!!
 

                         GREETINGS

                         This is an update on the information of my case. My trial attorneys
                         were contacted by my appeal attorney concerning the Police
                         Supplemental Reports done by Sgt. Grimshaw and Officer Charvoz.
                         Remember that these are the two police officers who say that they
                         are the ones involved in "kicking in" the door of the Moon Smoke
                         Shop. The trial attorneys say that the prosecutor never Disclosed
                         these important Supplemental Reports to them. One attorney said he
                         would have remembered if the prosecutor had because he is on
                         "friendly terms" with one of these officers. I am told that the trial
                         attorneys are willing to do affidavits saying that they never received
                         these police supplemental reports in disclosure from the prosecutor.
                         The prosecutor didn't Disclose this important evidence that
                         contradicted the lies that he was telling the judge and jury. Why do
                         you think he keeps this important evidence from my defense
                         attorney?

                         Prosecutor David White has finally filed his reply to my "bar
                         complaint". All paperwork has been filed with the Arizona State Bar
                         and we are now waiting for the State Bar to make a decision. The
                         investigation is on going.

                         All David White did in his reply was tell more lies to try to cover up
                         his lies and Misconduct during my trial. David White considers lying
                         to the judge and jury during my trial as a MINOR MISTAKE OF FACT
                         IN THE TRIAL OF STATE VS JONES.

                         David White repeatedly lied to the judge and jury about information
                         and evidence that he knew to be false. He used evidence against me
                         saying that the suspects are the ones who kicked in this door at the
                         Moon Smoke Shop. When he knew for a fact that police officers are
                         the ones who kicked in this door at least 15 minutes after the
                         suspects had left.

                         Also included in David Whites reply was an Affidavit done by
                         Detective Brenda Woolridge signed November 1st, 2000. In this
                         Affidavit she admits sat through Scott Nordstrom's trial and she
                         admits that she knew that the door was forced open by uniformed
                         officers. With this Affidavit Detective Woolridge admits to committing
                         Perjury while testifying during my trial.
                         No matter how many lies they tell trying to "cloud" and "confuse" the
                         issues, the facts of the case are that the prosecutor and detectives
                         used LIES, FALSE EVIDENCE, and FALSE TESTIMONY against me to
                         get their conviction. I am fighting to save my life for a crime I did
                         not commit because of their LIES and MISCONDUCT! My Rule 32
                         Appeal is next and I truly believe that with a good attorney I can
                         win a new trial.

                         I am still in need of a lot of help. I cannot do this alone. Even a small
                         donation to help pay for stamps, paper, pens and envelopes would
                         be of enormous help right now so I can continue to send out letters
                         trying to gain interest in my situation. No matter what, I want to
                         thank you for taking the time to read my information. I hope to hear
                         from you in the near future.

                         Utmost Respect,