THE EASIEST ROAD  . . .  DEATH
            [col. writ. 10/23/99] © 1999 Mumia Abu-Jamal writing on the Fred Thomas case
        For you are prisoners of war, in an enemy's country - of a war, too, that is
        unrivalled for its injustice, cruelty, meanness -- Frederick Douglass (1850)

It is increasingly easy to stereotype the men and women on Death row.  The State does it every day, as does the press.  Those banished to the most exclusive club
in America are deemed worthy of damnation, and in truth, all are presumed guilty,
for did not a jury say so?

Then one meets Fred Thomas, a 53-year-old great-grandfather, who was projected
to a jury as homeless, heartless and in the words of the DA, "a predator."

In a brief, week-long trial that went poorly defended, a jury convicted Fred of 1st degree murder, and a day later, on February 28, 1995, sent Fred to Death Row in Pennsylvania.

Why should one care about a "homeless, heartless, predator?" Clearly the jury didn't.
What the jury never learned was that an eyewitness, located the day after the killing
of a FedEx driver in the so-called "Bad lands" of North Philly, gave a statement to
the cops that she witnessed the shooting, named two of the assailants, and described
the third, none of which remotely resembled Thomas.  Indeed, her statement was corroborated by another witness, who saw the three men running away !
I know; I know; the question arises, well how did the prosecutor convict this man ?  Well, in their first attempt, they didn't, for the jury refused to convict, and a hung
jury was declared.

In the 2nd trial, the State provided two witnesses, both crack addicts, who claimed
they saw Fred fleeing the scene, but even they could not go as far as saying they saw
him shoot anyone, or even armed.  According to the woman who did see the shooting,
however, one of the assailants was related to one of the two witnesses who now
placed Fred at the scene.  These "witnesses," both of whom had extensive criminal
histories, were not asked about their drug-related activities, despite repeated
requests of counsel to do so.  A homeless man, desperate for a dollar to survive,
might rob and kill a truck driver; as would a drug addict.  But Fred wasn't a homeless
man, nor an addict, but a hard-working man, who worked a variety of jobs to support
his growing family.  When a group of his former and present employers appeared in
court on his behalf, they were told by his counsel that they weren't necessary.
They left. The jury never heard from the main witness because she was threatened
with the taking of her children.  At an extraordinary bench warrant hearing to compel
the witness's presence, the State revealed an extraordinary distaste for a person
who gave a statement in a murder proceeding:

               ADA: Well as I stated earlier, anything that the Commonwealth could do to
assist, of course, we will.  Back in October I brought to the Court's attention that,
and we shared the information with defense counsel: One, that this person was on
welfare under an assumed name.

               Defense: Yes, I have that.

               ADA: Thus, there is a real basis for a charge of welfare fraud.  We actively
looked for her during the various tours that my officers were working....

[Pre-trial Hearing, Com. V. Thomas 2/13/95]

      Again, this is a witness, not a suspect !  Contrary to popular opinion, under existing rules, the processing of a death sentence is the easiest in the system.
Oh yeah, the cops involved?  They are almost all doing time for the corruption
scandal around the 39th police district.

       Guess who " found " the witnesses ?

       Guess who prepped them ?

       And guess who advised others not to show up ?

       The infamous 39th District, which has a certain expertise in using drug addicts
and whores when they need "witnesses," are at the root of why Fred Thomas is on
death row, and not at home with his loving grandchildren.   He is innocent of murder,
and as of this writing, has a date to die for November 23rd, 1999.   Now, in truth, he
may survive past this death warrant, his second.  But the question arises, will he
survive Death Row?  A 53-year old, he recently was diagnosed as diabetic, and is
now insulin-dependant.  He has one fervent hope: " I hope my health don't give out,
so I can live long enough to prove my innocence."

© MAJ 1999
 
 
                  Return to Fred Thomas' Homepage
                          Mumia Abu Jamal's CCADP page

                  The CCADP offers free webpages to over 500 Death Row Prisoners
                                                Contact us for more information.
            The Eyes Of The World Are Watching Now
                                                       "The Eyes Of The World Are Watching Now"


This page was last updated December 28, 2001       Canadian Coalition Against the Death Penalty
This page is maintained and updated by Dave Parkinson and Tracy Lamourie in Toronto, Canada