Jay Neill - Oklahoma Death Row
                                                         

                                            Executed Dec 12 2002  Dec 12 2002

                                                            Homophobia Contributed To Death Sentence


Oklahoma executes gay man; appeals fail
Planet Out

Jay Wesley Neill, a 37-year-old gay man, died by lethal injection in Oklahoma tonight, despite a last-minute appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to stay the execution.

Neill was one of two men who robbed a bank in Geronimo, Okla., in 1984. During the robbery, Neill and his partner Robert Johnson stabbed three bank employees to death, and also shot four customers, one of whom also died. Neill was 19 at the time, while Johnson was 21.

Opponents of capital punishment decry all executions, but in this case, advocates like Amnesty International have an additional reason to plead for clemency: anti-gay bias. Addressing the jury during the sentencing phase of Neill's trial in 1992, the prosecutor said:

"I want you to think briefly about the man you're sitting in judgment on and determining what the appropriate punishment should be ... I'd like to go through some things that to me depict the true person, what kind of person he is. He is a homosexual. The person you're sitting in judgment on -- disregard Jay Neill. You're deciding life or death on a person that's a vowed (sic) homosexual ... But these are areas you consider whenever you determine the type of person you're sitting in judgment on. ... The individual's homosexual."

Neill was sentenced to death, despite evidence of an abusive childhood and despite his genuine contrition. At his sentencing trial, Neill told the families of his victims: "I am sorry. I am sorry. It's eating me, and I believe that's part of my punishment. I'm sorry. I don't know what to say to you. I wish there was something I could say to make it better but there's not."

In a separate trial, Robert Johnson was sentenced to life in prison.

Neill's death sentence was appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, where a 2-1 majority upheld the decision. Writing in dissent, Judge Carlos Lucero said the prosecutor's "blatant homophobic hatemongering … has no place in the courtrooms of a civilized society."

Neill declined an opportunity to plead for his life before the Pardon and Parole Board. "Amnesty International understands that this is in order to spare the murder victim's families more suffering," the watchdog group wrote.

According to the Associated Press, Neill's attorney, Jim Hankins, filed a motion to the Supreme Court on his behalf on Tuesday, but it was denied.

**************************

Homophobia Claimed in Oklahoma Execution   (Texas Triangle.com )

By Brent Brumley

OKLAHOMA CITY-Jay Wesley Neill was executed by the state of Oklahoma on Thursday, December 12. Activists say his death sentence was tainted by bias and homophobia.

Requests from organizations including Queer Watch, Queer to the Left, and Amnesty International to Oklahoma Governor, Frank Keating, to delay the execution were to no avail.

The groups say Oklahoma prosecutors urged the jury to consider Neill’s sexual orientation in determining whether to mete out a death sentence. They say homophobia is revealed by the prosecutor’s own words at trial.

“I want you to think briefly about the man you’re setting [sic] in judgment on and determining what the appropriate punishment should be,” the prosecutor told the jury. “[J]ust put in the back of your mind what if I was sitting in judgment on this person without relating it to Jay Neill, and I’d like to go through some things that to me depict the true person, what kind of person he is. He is a homosexual. The person you’re sitting in judgment on-disregard Jay Neill. You’re deciding the life or death on a person that’s a vowed homosexual.”

The prosecutor’s appeal to prejudice was successful. The jury sentenced Neill to death despite what the groups say was significant mitigating evidence of Neill’s remorse, his physical abuse at the hands of both his father and stepfather and medical problems as a child. The US 10th Circuit Court of Appeals found the prosecutor’s remarks to be illegitimate and improper but refused to overturn the sentence.

“The bias in this case is a chilling reminder of the long history of persecution of gay people, a reason for individuals and groups to actively work against capital punishment,” said Bill Dobbs, a New York activist and member of Queer Watch. Chicago lawyer Joey Mogul of Queer to the Left added, “Neill’s case is another example of a prosecutor who had no shame in relying on prejudice, here anti-gay prejudice, to obtain a death sentence.”

In 1983 Neill joined the US Army. He was discharged in the summer of 1984 after disclosing that he was gay. He and his partner, 21-year-old Robert Johnson began to have financial difficulties and by December 1984, they were thousands of dollars in debt. They decided to rob the Geronimo bank on December 14 of that year. During the robbery, three bank employees-Kay Bruno, Jerri Bowles, and Joyce Mullenix-were stabbed to death. Four customers were shot, one of whom-Ralph Zeller-died. Neill and Johnson were arrested in San Francisco three days later and found with proceeds from the robbery.

Johnson and Neill were tried together in 1985 and both sentenced to death. In 1992, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals reversed their convictions, finding that they should have been tried separately. On retrial, Robert Johnson received a sentence of life imprisonment without parole.

At the sentencing phase of his own 1992 retrial, Neill told the jury that he did not expect any sympathy and that he, not Johnson, had been in the bank at the time of the robbery. He expressed his remorse, telling the victims’ families: “I am sorry. I am sorry. It’s eating me and I believe that’s part of my punishment. I’m sorry. I don’t know what to say to you. I wish there was something I could say to make it better but there’s not”. He also related the abuse he had suffered at the hands of his father, and later his stepfather, when he was a child.

In August 2001, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the death sentence. One of the three judges, Judge Carlos Lucero, dissented, arguing that “the prosecutor’s blatant homophobic hatemongering at sentencing has no place in the courtrooms of a civilized society.” Judge Lucero wrote that the comments were “susceptible of only one possible interpretation: among other factors, Neill should be put to death because he is gay... I cannot sanction-because I have no confidence in-a proceeding tainted by a prosecutor’s request that jurors impose a death sentence based, even in part, on who the defendant is rather that what he has done”.

The 10th Circuit panel agreed to reconsider its decision, but in December 2001 again upheld the death sentence by two votes to one. This time the two in the majority acknowledged that the prosecutor’s comments had been “improper” and without “any legitimate justification”, but decided that the outcome of the trial had not been affected.

Judge Lucero again dissented, asking “what is it that makes the comments more than merely improper? As prosecutors know, gays and lesbians are routinely subject to invidious bias in all corners of society...The openly gay defendant thus finds himself at a disadvantage from the outset of his prosecution. When a prosecutor directs the jury to make its guilt-innocence or life-death determination on the basis of anti-homosexual bias, that disadvantage is magnified exponentially and raises constitutional concerns. This is so because prosecutors occupy a position of trust, and their exhortations carry significant weight with juries... Justification for these remarks was unquestionably illegitimate. Exploiting his position of trust and spinning the reality of anti-gay prejudice to a pivotal position in the capital-sentencing phase, the prosecutor undermined the possibility that petitioner’s sentence would be based on reason rather than emotion”.

Activists say Neill’s sentence was the second execution in recent Oklahoma history where the state used homophobic prejudice to get a death sentence. In 2001, Wanda Jean Allen, an African-American lesbian, was executed for killing her lover, Gloria Leathers, after the two had a physical fight. In Allen’s case, the prosecutors used what many saw as homophobia and sexism to dehumanize Allen in front of the jury by arguing she was the “man” in the relationship, that she wore the pants in the family, and emphasizing that she spelled her name in a masculine way. In Allen’s case, there were also questions regarding her mental retardation, and incompetent legal representation.

The United Nations Guidelines on the Role of Prosecutors requires that prosecutors “perform their duties fairly, consistently and expeditiously, and respect and protect human dignity and uphold human rights”, and “carry out their functions impartially and avoid all political, social, religious, racial, cultural, sexual or any other kind of discrimination”. The right to freedom from discrimination on the basis of sex, which includes sexual orientation, is recognized in international treaties, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases. Today, 111 countries have abolished judicial killing in law or practice. Since the USA resumed executions in 1977, 810 prisoners have been put to death nationwide, 52 of them in Oklahoma. Prosecutorial conduct is one of the issues highlighted in Amnesty International’s April 2001 report on the death penalty in Oklahoma, Old Habits Die Hard (AMR 51/055/2001).

Queer to the Left is a justice organization of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals based in Illinois. Queer Watch is a national gay justice group that campaigned against capital punishment for the killers of Matthew Shepard.


                THE PEN PAL REQUEST JAY ORIGINALLY SENT THE CCADP

JAY NEILL    Some of what interests me...  On death row there are few options in the way of hobbies/activities.  But I do love to read.  And I enjoy writing letters.  I crochet afghans, and just about anything I can think of, or have a pattern for.  Right now I'm involved in a quest of self discovery.  A spiritual quest.  Not in a "traditional Religious" manner.  More so a spiritual quest of who I am, my place in this existence.  I do believe in a soul.     I've read many books covering many religions, and spiritual beliefs, and their history.   each belief system centers primarily on "love". On good & bad deeds, and/or Karma.  Allowing room for the basic human nature that sways the writer of any history to shape the text, and its contents towards his/her own morality & ideas.    I think there is ample proof from which to draw the conclusion that life did not simply "happen" by accident.   I also like new ideas, and good conversation.  And any letters I write, will be varied, as to interests & topic.    I have definite opinions, and I expect that others do too. Above all, I enjoy the sharing of love, and positive thoughts.   I'm as unjudgmental as I know how to be.   I believe every person has an individual right to live their lives free of harm, and prejudice.  I just wish I knew more about life when I was a confused 19 year old.  The age I was, when I committed this crime.   Sincerely Yours...

Jay Neill  141128

H-SE-8-II
PO Box 97
McAlester, OK



                 The CCADP offers free webpages to over 500 Death Row Prisoners
                                               Contact us for more information.
            The Eyes Of The World Are Watching Now
                                                       "The Eyes Of The World Are Watching Now"

This page was last updated September 30, 2003       Canadian Coalition Against the Death Penalty
This page is maintained and updated by Dave Parkinson and Tracy Lamourie in Toronto, Canada