| Return to James Anderson's Homepage |
RECIPE FOR DESTRUCTION,
SUPREME INJUSTICE
by James P. Anderson
After being wrongfully convicted and
sentenced to
California Death Row over 22 years
ago (1979), the
California Supreme Court "DENIED" my
"DIRECT APPEAL"
on May 14, 2001. (The decision for
the Habeas Corpus
Petition is still pending; it was filed
by
court-appointed attorney Alister McAlister).
Documents
and records are readily available that
show every
court appointed attorney representing
me in court has
had difficulties with the California
Bar Association
and has been "suspended from practicing
law several
times," including an alcoholic (Keith
H. Long) who had
seriously contemplated suicide "several
times."
The Attorney currently appointed (Alister
McAlister)
has proven himself to be "grossly incompetent,"
since
his appointment by the Supreme Court
in 1994. I
actually wrote to the Supreme Court
requesting that
the court "Relieve" both Alister McAlister
and
California Appellate Project Attorney
Aundre M. Herron
as my Death Penalty Attorneys, because
"NEITHER" would
investigate relevant issues or obtain
simple
documents, records, articles etc. directly
related to
proving my innocence (most of these
request could have
been accomplished by a simple phone
call). The Supreme
Court failed to respond to my mailings.
An example of the Attorney's "Gross
Incompetence" is
that I phoned McAlister on May 17,
2001 to inquire
about time restraints on filing motions
etc. After
answering my questions McAlister stated,
"Oh, by the
way, the Supreme Court reached a decision
on your case
three days ago." When asked what the
decision was
(twice), McAlister simply repeated
his statement,
adding, "I'll send you a copy of the
73 page decision
if you want me to." To date (20 days
later), I have
not
received a copy of the Court decision.
McAlister also waited until May 25,
2001 to file the
required "Appellate petition for Rehearing."
The
court's time limit for filing this
petition is 15
days; otherwise, any and all reversible
issues that
the Court "DID NOT" rule or reach a
decision on, can
"NEVER" be raised again in a court
of law. However,
McAlister only raised (cited) 0NE issue
in his
"Petition for Rehearing." Needless
to say, there
were/are "MANY"
different issues that could've/should've
been cited in
this petition. (But with my NOT having
a copy of the
court's decision as a guideline or
to refer to for
specifics, it's impossible for me to
name the specific
issues or how many there are. It should
be noted, too,
that McAlister filed my Direct Appeal,
Habeas Corpus
and Appellate Petition for Rehearing
without giving me
the opportunity to review and/or discuss
the contents
prior to his submitting these petitions
to the Court
(defendant or appellate has the "Legal
Right" to
review all documents prior to filing).
Equally important, McAlister confirmed
during a
December 2000 phone call that he had
NEVER possessed
or listened to six cassette taped interviews
of a
prosecution witness (Debbie Baros),
whom the courts in
two different states had deemed to
be "Extremely
Mentally ill and delusional." Also,
the court
"REFUSED"
to allow "The Jury" to be informed
of her mental state
(this includes her having given birth
to four
different imaginary children, an imaginary
car/truck
accident in
which one of the imaginary children
was killed, an
unadjudicated 1978 homicide statement
that she knew I
was a member of the Mafia and that
I possessed
"Telepathic powers" etc., etc.
Ironically, while
Debbie Baros invented or dreamed the
four children
described on the prosecution's cassette
taped
interviews, she actually had given
birth to two
children, but they were taken away
from her by the
State of New Hampshire in 1987 or 1988
as a result of
her sexual abuse. Again, the jury was
NOT informed of
these facts. (These documents are accessible
through
the state of New Hampshire Child Protection
Services.)
Each person reading this article should
also be
informed that the victims of this crime
were/are
white, and that there were all white
jurors (which is
a Prima Fascie Wheeler Motion Mistrial).
As well, I
have in my possession court transcripts
and a letter
from a Municipal Court Judge that confirms
and clearly
states that the Prosecutor of the 1979
Trial
intentionally lied to both the Trial
Judge and Jury,
stating that the states alleged witness
(the person
that actually committed the crimes)
had been given a
polygraph test to eliminate the witness
as having been
the perpetrator of the crimes, but
the facts and
record prove UNDOUBTEDLY that NO P0LYGRAPH
TEST was
ever given to this alleged witness.
A "PART" of the
murder weapon was also found "IN THE
JACKET POCKET OF
THE WITNESS." All facts considered,
I believe that any
reasonably
sound-minded person would agree that
my conviction and
sentence were politically motivated,
and that "Racism"
was/is a major factor.
As a result of the ongoing medical neglect
and
deliberate indifference (see facts
page), I'm unable
to pursue legal research for both the
legal and
medical matters, and would appreciate
any competent
legal assistance in preparing petitions
for the Court
which would remedy both the wrongful
conviction and
medical matters.
In Struggle,
James P. Anderson
May 3, 2001
| Return to James Anderson's Homepage |
