| Return To Fred Thomas' Homepage |
Dying on death row, he goes to court---Inmate
Frederick A. Thomas, who
has a terminal liver disease, contends
that he did not commit a 1993 killing.
Philadelphia Inquirer
Death-row inmate Frederick
A. Thomas finally got his day in court
yesterday to try to prove
that he was not involved in the 1993 slaying of
a FedEx courier, and the
1st witness backed him up, testifying that the
killer was a local drug
dealer named "Little Man."
Thomas, 56, who is dying
of liver disease, was convicted and sentenced to
death in 1995 for the December
1993 shooting death of the courier,
William "Skip" Moyer Jr.
of Delaware County.
Yesterday was the start of
what is expected to be a weeklong hearing on
the defense effort to try
to persuade Philadelphia Common Pleas Court
Judge Willis W. Berry Jr.
that Thomas deserves a new trial.
The new defense witness,
James H. Wilkerson, testified that he saw two
neighborhood men near the
FedEx vehicle at Ninth and Clearfield Streets
in North Philadelphia, and
watched as "Little Man" shot the driver. He
said the 3 then fled in
a brown Toyota hatchback.
Wilkerson testified that
he did not come forward until last fall because
he was fearful of "Little
Man" and the 2 other local men who he said were
involved. He said he also
was fearful of the Philadelphia police.
"So you saw a killing, but you never said nothing?" Berry asked Wilkerson.
"I was scared," replied Wilkerson,
who said he did not know the shooter's
real name but heard recently
that the man was deported to Ecuador.
It may all be of little consequence.
A doctor has concluded that Thomas'
condition appears to be
terminal, and his family and lawyers say he has
been trying to live long
enough to have his day in court.
Prosecutors are opposing
the defense effort; they have said the evidence
points to Thomas, who has
been convicted in the past of robbery,
burglary, manslaughter and
assault.
It was a contentious day,
with the lawyers sparring over photocopies of
photographs and a flap over
the homicide file in the case, and the judge
stepping in at times with
questions of his own for the witnesses.
Under questioning by federal
public defender James Moreno, Wilkerson
testified that he was standing
on the steps of his mother's house the
morning of Dec. 21, 1993,
putting up Christmas decorations, when he saw
the shooting.
"Is this man, Fred Thomas, the man who shot the FedEx driver?" Moreno asked.
"No," Wilkerson replied.
Wilkerson testified that
his "life wasn't together" and that he was
"really scared" at the time
of the killing, but that he had since
straightened out his life
and decided to come forward at the behest of
one of Thomas' nephews.
During cross-examination,
Assistant District Attorney Hugh Colihan
challenged Wilkerson's credibility
by questioning him about several
arrests and noting that
he knew a number of Thomas' relatives from the
neighborhood.
Colihan also questioned Wilkerson
about a visit from two men with badges
nine days ago. Wilkerson
testified that the two men took him to a police
station at Front and Westmoreland
Streets, put him in a room, and left
him there for more than
9 hours.
"Did they arrest you?" Berry asked.
"No," replied Wilkerson,
who said he eventually left and told his lawyer,
who wrote a letter complaining
about the incident.
Under later questioning,
Moreno asked Wilkerson if anyone had forced him
to come forward. "No," he
replied.
"Are you telling the truth?" Moreno asked.
"Yes," Wilkerson replied.
Outside the courtroom, Christopher
Diviny, who heads the unit in the
District Attorney's Office
that is handling the Thomas case, said he was
trying to determine what
- if anything - had happened at the station. He
said there was no police
record of Wilkerson's having been brought to the
police station.
Also testifying yesterday
was Mitchell Fielding, who said that his late
wife, Maria, had told him
she saw three young black men take part in the
killing. He said she told
police that Thomas was not involved.
Fielding testified that Officer
James Ryan threatened his wife, telling
her that if she testified
for Thomas he would see that the couple's
children were taken away
from them. Ryan later pleaded guilty in a
corruption scandal and is
no longer with the department.
(source: Philadelphia Inquirer)
Fred Thomas' friends and attorneys are
frantically trying to save the dying
man from death row, claiming he’s an
innocent victim of a bad cop and a shoddy investigation.
The neighborhood around Ninth and Clearfield, in
that part of North Philly sometimes called the
Badlands, was settling down from its morning
routine shortly after 9 a.m. on the rainy morning
of Dec. 21, 1993. Mothers had already walked
their children to school, and the usual drinkers
had taken up their posts on the northeast
corner. Federal Express driver William Moyer, Jr.
was parked near the southwest corner — not far from where a local man known
to some as "Crazy Fred" was standing, waiting for a store to open — and
was
preparing to make a delivery.
Moyer never delivered the package. The men on the northeast corner, Willie
"Greenie" Green and Charles "Countrie" Rowe, heard a bang, and from where
they were sitting, Rowe could see Moyer’s feet next to one of the truck
tires.
But they decided not to get involved, and they left to run an errand.
Police arriving at the scene found that Moyer, a 37-year-old father of
four, had
been shot in the face at close range. The bullet entered his left cheek
and
traveled back and upward, injuring his brain stem and killing him instantly.
The
first cop on the scene, Officer Michael Trask, would note later that there
was a
trail of blood "about four house lengths" from Moyer to the gutter. The
rain
washed some of the blood away, but there was still plenty — enough to raise
splatter issues at the trial for Moyer’s murder and call into account the
credibility
of witness statements.
The police found Moyer’s wallet, still on him, and $61 in his left pants
pocket.
They also found an opened package containing newspapers in the Federal
Express truck.
By the time Rowe and Green returned, a small crowd of neighborhood residents
had gathered. A homicide detective arrived within an hour and directed
the
mobile crime unit, which took black-and-white photographs and produced
a
sketch of the crime scene.
Rowe and Green returned to the corner, but avoided police and were not
questioned until a cop who had no official reason to be interested in the
case
brought them in a day or so later. They said Frederick A. Thomas, 56, the
man
waiting for the corner store to open, had run around the truck after the
gunshot and disappeared down an alley; Rowe said that Thomas had "seemed
like he had something under his coat." He and Green became the prosecution’s
star witnesses.
Their statements would become the key for an arrest and conviction. Nothing
else connected "Crazy Fred" Thomas to the murder of William Moyer.
Two years later, Thomas, a man with a history of
run-ins with the law that includes convictions for
manslaughter and aggravated assault, was
convicted of Moyer’s murder and sentenced to
death. He was tried twice; the first ended in a
hung jury. No physical evidence was presented
at either trial linking Thomas to the shooting.
Today, defense attorneys with the Capital
Habeas Unit of the Federal Defender Association
of Philadelphia contend that Thomas, known for
his volatile temper and alcoholism, was the fall guy for a crooked cop
and a
band of drug dealers, as well as the victim of an ineffective initial defense
effort.
They are working tirelessly to have his conviction overturned. Recently,
they’ve
been given some encouragement: A Philadelphia judge has granted Thomas
a
hearing. On Feb. 25, Common Pleas Court Judge Willis Berry Jr., will hear
the
merits of his case.
Thomas doesn’t have time to spare; he is suffering from liver failure and
a host
of other ailments. Defense attorney Kica Matos says, "All [Thomas] wants
before he dies is to have his innocence proven. He wants his day in court."
Last week, death-penalty opponents and supporters of Thomas attended a
rally led by Pennsylvania Abolitionists United Against the Death Penalty,
during
which protesters chanted the names of Andrew Gibson, the assistant district
attorney on the case, and Christopher Diviny, the chief of Gibson’s unit.
They
were called upon "to let justice prevail" and to stop fighting a reopening
of the
case.
Diviny says, however, that prosecutors are "confident that Fred Thomas
is the
killer."
The father of the murder victim, William Moyer, Sr. says, "I sat through
two
trials; with what I saw, I’m convinced he was given a fair trial."
Records show that a male caller phoned police
three days after the murder to say that he
worked for Federal Express and "had heard that
Moyer had been opening packages that he was
to deliver" and "that whenever Moyer delivered
to a certain address in North Philly, he knew
drugs were being sent to the address because it
was always the same address." The caller
alleged that Moyer "had taken some weed and
recently ‘ripped off’ a kilo of cocaine."
According to the coroner’s report, Moyer had
cocaine and methamphetamine in his system at the time of the killing.
The sender of the open package on the truck — the package Moyer apparently
was preparing to deliver — was listed as Colecciones Biblicas International
Inc.,
from Santurce, Puerto Rico. Although the only contents by the time the
police
arrived were a few newspapers, the package was insured for $100. Perhaps
more interesting, the package was addressed to Roberto Perez, a man the
police never located. People living at the address, on the 3000 block of
North
Ninth Street, have since told defense investigators they do not know a
Roberto
Perez and that such packages were left on the porch frequently and would
eventually disappear.
Matos has worked on Thomas’ appeal effort since it began. (She’s recently
moved to Connecticut and is no longer with the Defender Association.) She
says
there were problems with most of the prosecution’s witnesses.
A UPS driver testified that Thomas had stalked him on deliveries, roughly
between June 1992 and December 1992. Thomas, however, was serving a
sentence for a parole violation between December 1991 and October 1992.
Matos also says the defense investigation wasn’t thorough enough. For
example, Jeffrey Fooks, a nephew of Thomas, says he was on the corner when
the shot fired, and the details he provides coincide with much of what
Rowe
says. He says his uncle was already on his way down an alley when the murder
occurred. The police have never questioned Fooks, but according to him,
they
did break his door down looking for Thomas. He signed an affidavit in March
2000 stating that he saw another man exit the truck "with a package in
[his]
hands." Original defense attorney Jay Gottlieb says he interviewed Fooks
"up
and down" at the time of trial, and Fooks didn’t give him that information.
Ryan was one of the state’s witnesses himself; he testified at the first
trial
regarding his role in the investigation. By the time of the second trial,
Ryan was
under investigation for criminal conduct and did not testify, though, according
to
several people in attendance at the second trial, Ryan was a fixture there.
Mildred Thomas, Fred’s younger sister, says he "sat in the first row throughout
the trial with the other police officers."
During the first trial, Mildred Thomas says, Ryan stayed close to the police
and
the victim’s family. She says Ryan "was always with the [Moyer] family."
Mildred
recalls "a confrontation" with Ryan, following a heated exchange between
her
daughter and someone she believes to be Moyer’s sister: "After, [Moyer’s
sister] went into the anteroom by the courtroom, and Ryan came out. He
started talking about putting his foot in people’s butts. I said, ‘Come
on. I’m
waiting.’ … He started walking toward me and his partner stopped him."
Mildred says she remembers her nephew Carl Fooks (brother of Jeffrey)
approaching Ryan outside the courtroom. "He said, ‘Watch me make him mad.’
Then Carl told him the dealers had paid their people the day before, and
he
wouldn’t get his envelope. Ryan said, ‘If they mess with me, I’ll put my
fucking
boot up their ass.’" Carl Fooks has provided a signed statement about that
alleged encounter.
Attempts to reach Ryan were not successful. Calls to his attorney were
not
returned by press time.
Assistant D.A. Chris Diviny says that Ryan’s
involvement begins and ends with that visit and
ride to Homicide. "On the same day of the
shooting," says Diviny, Ryan and another officer
"brought Willie Green in. That’s the end of
[Ryan’s] involvement."
Though Rowe says in his statement that Ryan
escorted him to Homicide to be interviewed,
Diviny says that assertion is inconsistent with
police records.
In a United States District Court deposition for a different case in 1996,
however, Ryan takes credit for "outstanding arrests" that include that
of Fred
Thomas. He also says in the deposition, "Myself and my partner went out
and
found two witnesses, and this led to the arrest."
In May 1995, Ryan pleaded guilty to charges stemming from the infamous
39th
District scandal, including entering and searching premises without probable
cause; conducting armed illegal detentions; stealing money and property;
falsifying police reports, affidavits of probable cause for arrest warrants
and
search warrants; and engaging in illegal stops and searches outside of
his
district, which were never documented in the official police paperwork.
He
served 42 months in federal prison.
Diviny maintains that Ryan was minimally involved and didn’t taint the
case.
"You’re able to see what he did. Ryan didn’t take any statements. Rowe
and
Green testified at both trials, and after trial, as [the defense attorney]
pointed
out himself, they were interrogated by Internal Affairs and said they were
not
coerced."
Diviny says the original testimonies of Green and Rowe are what’s material.
"They didn’t overreach.… They’re not saying they saw the actual shooting;
they’re saying things that have the ring of truth because they’re appropriately
limited by their position on the corner and what they were able to see."
In the eight years since Moyer died, people on the street at the time of
the
killing, as well as their relatives, have been prodded by investigators,
attorneys
and journalists. Joe Thornton, an investigator for the Defender Association’s
Capital Habeas Unit, says, "The thing about many capital cases is that
they
have such long tails." The twists and turns, the crucial people disappearing
or
dying, are not peculiar to Fred Thomas’ case, he explains. Still, he says,
"There
is an inordinate number in Fred’s case."
Thornton knows the Badlands, in some ways probably as well as the people
who live there. The bands of drug dealers on the corners, the crack houses
and
the worn faces of junkies, ex-junkies and people with secrets have grown
familiar. He says there’s more to the place than meets the eye.
"The people who are struggling out of their addictions have a resiliency
that
only that barren a neighborhood can allow them to have," he explains.
Something else you see, he says, is that the men don’t survive the ravages
of
drugs and poverty into old age. "There is an absence of African-American
males
over 40 there.… [But] I still see [Rowe] down there from time to time.
There are
half a dozen old guys who remind me of lions who are standing on their
last
legs, yet are still able to survive in that neighborhood."
He says Thomas, who suffered from childhood abuse, brain damage and
alcoholism, is one of those lions. "The striking thing about Fred Thomas
is,
through it all, he survived."
A few years ago, Thornton tracked Rowe and Green down. Green was the first
to be reached, and after several conversations, Thornton says, "I got details
out of him."
Rowe and Green both would eventually recant, claiming that police intimidated
them into implicating Thomas, but of the two, Green was "more remorseful
[regarding] what he perceived to be his lack of courage at the time [he
gave his
original account to police]," Thornton says. "He felt coerced into saying
stuff
that wasn’t true. He felt bad — it was obvious."
Rowe signed an affidavit, but Green died of cancer before Thornton could
return
to have him sign a statement.
Green and Rowe’s inconsistent statements are just the beginning of the
problems with the conviction, according to the defense team. This past
October,
a man named James Wilkerson signed an affidavit stating that he saw someone
known as "Little Man" shoot the driver.
And then there’s Maria Fielding. Defense attorneys past and present speak
of
her with a sigh.
Police reports indicate that Fielding, an area resident who frequented
the
corner, gave a statement to police the day after the shooting. She said
three
men were involved in the shooting. She identified one as "Tony," and the
defense team argues today that her description matches that of a
neighborhood man named Antonio Stokley, whose record includes drug sales
and possession charges. He is reputed to have been an associate of Alberto
"Little Man" Arroyo, a man described by a former girlfriend as a "crack
addict
and gunslinger" in an affidavit signed in December.
In another affidavit, a neighbor describes Arroyo walking by the crime
scene,
acting suspiciously ("I remember he never looked up Ninth Street at the
man
[lying] on the sidewalk") and, shortly after, changing his clothes. She
states
that she told police about Arroyo’s suspicious behavior. Arroyo was
subsequently interviewed by police, but though he has a criminal record
that
includes arrests for drug sales, robbery, assault and weapons possession,
his
explanation for changing his clothes — "It was cold" — was apparently
acceptable enough to police that they wrote him off as a suspect.
They and prosecutors also apparently ignored the fact that Stokley is a
nephew
of Rowe, one of the star witnesses.
Kenny Miller of the State Correctional Institute at Greensburg (near Harrisburg),
where Stokley is serving time for an unrelated conviction, relayed a comment
from Stokley, who says he "knows nothing about" the murder. Arroyo was
deported to Ecuador sometime in the past few years and couldn’t be reached
for comment.
"Maria Fielding gave very graphic descriptions," Thornton says of the witness
whose account poked holes in Rowe’s and Green’s. "Wilkerson was available.
These [witnesses] were available the day of the homicide and the Philadelphia
Police didn’t do anything with it. That may be the biggest tragedy."
Mitchell Fielding lives with his five children in a two-story brick house
he proudly
calls "kiddy city." A gallery of stuffed animals line the top of a sofa
in the living
room, and an array of plastic dollhouses are set on another. The kids’
bedrooms
are stacked with toys and neatly folded piles of laundry. When his wife
Maria
died of cancer in 1999 at age 33, the kids ranged in age from 7 to 3, and
since
then he’s done his best to give them routine and warmth. A photo of Maria
is
set on the wall next to the door. Though she was a handful and had a drug
problem, he says, she "always came home," and he likes to remember her
smiling and content. The Moyer murder investigation brings up painful memories
for him. "I like to forget it," he says.
Before Maria died, she spoke to him, he says, about how sorry she was that
Fred Thomas had been convicted for Moyer’s murder, how sorry she was not
to
have been able "to tell what she observed." It’s not clear whether she
knew
Fred at all.
In an affidavit, Mitchell Fielding contends that two police officers visited
the
Fielding residence shortly after the shooting and that Maria told them,
in his
presence, that Thomas "was not among those whom she had observed running
from the scene." Mitchell later identified Ryan, from a selection of photographs
brought to him by Thornton, as one of the officers who visited the house.
Mitchell recalls Maria coming home from court in tears the day she was
to testify
as a defense witness, having fled because one of the officers approached
her
again and told her to "take a hike" and said she’d lose her kids if she
testified
— an account supported by Carl Fooks, who says he heard the exchange.
Jay Gottlieb, Thomas’ attorney for the first two trials, says Maria Fielding
was
"absolutely vital" to Thomas’ defense argument. "She names three
[perpetrators], not Fred," he says. "And one is the nephew of one of the
[prosecution’s] eyewitnesses."
A few days before the first trial began, however, Fielding called Gottlieb
and
said she was sick, and "a man who said he was her husband got on the phone
and just said, ‘She’s not coming in.’"
Mitchell Fielding insists, however, that Maria was preparing to testify
and that
he dropped her off at the courthouse himself; seven years later, he’s not
sure
which trial it was. At least four people City Paper spoke to described
her in the
courtroom or outside of it, and there are signed affidavits to that effect
that
include accounts of Ryan allegedly intimidating Fielding.
Thornton says he believes that Fielding actually showed up at the second
trial
after having "a crisis of conscience." Regardless, Fielding is still the
heartbreak
for this case, in Gottlieb’s opinion.
After Fielding phoned to say she wouldn’t testify, Gottlieb says, he approached
the court for a continuance so she could be found and brought in. "We had
a
conference, in chambers. [Prosecutor Roger King] said, ‘How important is
she?
She’s just a street junkie.’" Gottlieb says he pointed out that the prosecution’s
witnesses, Rowe and Green, both had criminal records and were no angels.
The
judge agreed with the prosecution and denied a continuance. Gottlieb says,
"I
told the judge that Fielding was as vital a witness as there ever was,
anywhere." The judge, Justice Juanita Kidd Stout, issued a bench warrant
for
Fielding, but she was never picked up.
Gottlieb doesn’t know if she appeared intending to testify; he never met
her in
person. Just as closing arguments were to begin in the first trial, relatives
of
Thomas approached him and said Fielding was in the building, in another
courtroom. Gottlieb asked the judge for time to locate her, and ran out
of the
courtroom with one of the people who saw her. He didn’t find her. "I needed
her desperately," he admits.
The late Fielding wasn’t the only witness that got away. Brenda Gregory
gave a
statement to police the day of the murder, mostly to do with sounds outside
her window. "Brenda Gregory heard the footsteps of multiple individuals
and
out of her window sees two guys [running] south of her house," Gottlieb
says.
Gregory never showed either, according to Gottlieb. She has since suffered
a
stroke.
In a motion to dismiss , Assistant D.A. Andrew Gibson dismisses Fielding’s
account, based on her description of "watching the gunman fire two shots
at
the victim," because "the police never recovered any physical evidence
showing
that a second shot had been fired…"
Gibson argues that "the account of the killing described by Mrs. Fielding
was
completely at odds with the physical evidence found at the crime scene."
The
prosecutors hold that blood spatters found inside the truck and the upward
trajectory of the bullet show that Moyer was standing inside the truck
when he
was shot, not on the ground as Fielding described.
But in Fielding’s statement, she describes hearing "Pow! Pow!" — not seeing
the shooting.
Defense attorney Anne Saunders contends Fielding wasn’t an expert on
ammunition sounds. "When a shot is fired, there can be reverb," she says.
Saunders and her team recently added Albert Harper, a forensics expert
and
director of the Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science at the University
of
New Haven, to its list of witnesses.
Harper, who has examined crime-scene photos, police-investigation materials,
trial exhibits and the coroner’s report, refutes the prosecution’s account
of the
shooting. "It is clear that at the time he was shot, Mr. Moyer’s feet were
on the
ground outside of his truck," Harper writes in an affidavit. He also concludes
the
testimony of the police expert regarding "the placement of Mr. Moyer and
his
assailants was inaccurate and not consistent with the evidence."
According to Harper, one of the problems is that the Philadelphia Police,
at the
time of Moyer’s murder, did not use color film to take crime-scene photographs.
In an affidavit signed Jan. 3, he states, "It is very difficult, if not…
impossible, to
render a reliable opinion concerning the interpretation of blood spatter
from
black-and-white photographs."
There are other possible holes in the prosecutors’ case against granting
Thomas an appeal.
Prosecutor Andrew Gibson argues that "Mrs. Fielding’s description of having
seen ‘Tony,’ one of the assailants, flee through a specific alleyway was
also
proved false, because the police investigation … revealed that both ends
of the
alley were secured by locked gates." Defense attorney Anne Saunders says
prosecutor Roger King asserted this at trial, but presented no evidence
or
testimony.
(This past August, a woman on North Ninth Street signed an affidavit stating
that "there was no fence blocking the alley" when she moved on to the street
in question in 1999.)
"I thought [we] got screwed," Gottlieb recalls. "I always thought that
something was going on that was evil, wrong." He says he felt "powerless."
When asked to be more specific, he says, "I felt there was police corruption
and
coercion in this case. My gut instinct — hell, [Thomas] was no angel. But
this
guy had no reason to shoot this driver." Gottlieb echoes current attorney
Kica
Matos’ contention regarding Thomas’ profile, saying that his previous arrests,
including his conviction for shooting a man in 1991, involved barroom brawls
and disputes over women, not strong-arm robbery.
"The FedEx murder," Matos says, "does not fit his m.o. for getting into trouble."
Assistant D.A. Chris Diviny insists Thomas’ past is consistent with the
guilty
verdict in his case: "He’s been convicted on manslaughter [charges]. He
shot
someone a block away from [where the murder of Moyer took place], and was
convicted of aggravated assault for that."
Matos says in response, "We have never alleged that he was a poster boy.
We’ve alleged that he didn’t commit this murder."
Moyer’s father, William Sr., isn’t sorry Thomas was convicted.
"After killing one person, shooting another, a rap sheet 27 pages long,
he’ll get
to die on clean sheets," Moyer says, "while my son died in a gutter in
the rain."
But Thomas’ family and attorneys are trying to prevent what they believe
would
be an equally unjust death.
At the rally a week ago, the same day a court date was sent for an evidentiary
hearing on the Thomas case, three dozen people gathered, listening to a
heated appeal for "justice." Defense attorney Kica Matos, confessing to
little
sleep, stood off to the side and watched.
"We’re not giving up," she said.
http://citypaper.net/articles/011702/cs.cover.shtml
Like many of the 244 people
on Pennsylvania's death row, Frederick A. Thomas says he didn't do
it.
He contends that a crooked
Philadelphia police officer framed him, that a key witness against him
has recanted, and that a
new witness has come forward to clear him in the killing of a Federal
Express driver in December
1993.
But Thomas' request for a new day in court is unusual in one way: He is dying.
His lawyers want a speedy
hearing. They say Thomas, 56, who has hepatitis and other illnesses, may
soon die of liver failure.
"He hopes he lives long enough
to see his claims litigated and to hear the witnesses come in and
exonerate him," said James
Moreno, one of four public defenders pressing the appeal.
Prosecutors say Thomas has "utterly failed to demonstrate any miscarriage of justice."
Some facts in Thomas' case
go to the heart of the national debate about the fairness of the death
penalty: No DNA, fingerprints,
gun or other physical evidence tie him to the killing. Two witnesses
testified of hearing a shot,
and of having seen Thomas flee the scene tucking an object into his pants.
In May, one of the witnesses
signed an affidavit for defense lawyers saying that Thomas was not
involved. The other witness
has died.
Thomas contends that the
state's case was tainted by the officer who found the key witnesses: James
Ryan, who was caught up
in the 39th District police scandal of the 1990s, and who served 42
months in federal prison
after admitting that he had faked evidence against drug suspects and robbed
them.
The lawyers contend that
Ryan may have wanted to protect a drug dealer from being implicated in
the killing. Prosecutors
reject that notion.
Thomas has a record: convictions
for robbery in 1969, burglary in 1974, manslaughter in 1982 for
stabbing a man in a drunken
fight, and assault for shooting a man in a 1991 argument over a woman.
He is serving a 71/2- to
15-year sentence for that.
His execution date has not
been set. He was recently transferred to the infirmary at the state prison
in
Graterford so his family
can visit him.
An alcoholic, he has diabetes
and internal bleeding. A doctor determined that his condition "appears
terminal."
Thomas' relatives and an
anti-death penalty group held a news conference on Friday. His sister
Mildred said she regretted
causing fresh pain for the victim's family, but that if her brother got
a
hearing, perhaps he could
die in peace.
"There's no more time for
Fred," she said.
The killing of William "Skip"
Moyer, 37, a father of four, stunned the city, and a parade of FedEx
trucks rode in his funeral
procession.
A FedEx driver for a decade,
Moyer was shot in the face about 9:30 a.m. on Dec. 21, 1993, as he
delivered a parcel near
Ninth and Clearfield Streets in North Philadelphia, an area known as the
Badlands because of drug
activity. He was the first FedEx courier killed on duty.
Police said robbery appeared
to be the motive, though nothing was taken from Moyer or his truck.
At first they believed two
assailants were involved, but they later concluded that Thomas had acted
alone.
Thomas, then 48, turned himself
in just before midnight on Christmas Eve, accompanied by relatives.
Thomas said that night that
police had the wrong man. "I didn't do it," he told reporters.
Two years later, he repeated that after his sentencing: "They found the wrong man guilty."
His lawyers have raised a number of issues, including these:
A man named James Wilkerson
gave them a statement on Oct. 12 saying that he saw the killing, and
that the shooter was not
Thomas, but a resident of the area known as "Little Man."
The role of Ryan, who pleaded
guilty in 1995 to corruption charges. His admissions and those of
another 39th District officer
that they faked statements resulted in dismissals of a string of drug cases.
Ryan has sworn that his
work in the murder case, when he was in the highway patrol unit, was
proper.
Maria Fielding, who died
in 1999, told police years ago that she saw the crime - and that the
assailants were three men
she recognized, all much younger than Thomas. The defense subpoenaed
her in Thomas' trial, but
she failed to appear.
Fielding's husband, Mitchell
Fielding, gave the lawyers a statement last year saying Ryan had warned
his wife that she could
lose custody of her children if she testified for Thomas.
Thomas testified that he
had walked near the scene that morning on his way to his nephew's home,
where he drank and played
cards for hours.
The nephew and another man testified that Thomas was with them until about 1 p.m.
Thomas' first trial ended
with a hung jury. Ryan was one of the state's witnesses. The retrial, in
which
Ryan did not testify, ended
with Thomas' conviction on Feb. 27, 1995. The jury sentenced him to
death.
State courts have upheld
his conviction, and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear his appeal in
1999. Thomas is bringing
new challenges in local and federal court.
In court papers filed in
May, Assistant District Attorney Andrew Gibson said Thomas' conviction
"was entirely proper, based
upon highly compelling evidence of his guilt."
Gibson questioned Maria Fielding's
credibility, saying her account did not square with the crime
scene. He also said she
had used four aliases, and was arrested during the trial on an unrelated
charge.
Christopher Diviny, chief
of Gibson's unit, said the District Attorney's Office was investigating
the
account of Wilkerson, the
witness who said Thomas was not the shooter. Diviny also said Ryan
played only a bit part in
the case.
During a 1996 deposition
in an unrelated lawsuit, Ryan called Thomas' arrest an "outstanding"
achievement.
"There was no homicide leads,
no nothing," he said. "Myself and my partner went out and found two
witnesses, and this led
to the arrest."
Ryan declined to comment
last week. His lawyer, Brian McMonagle, said Ryan "feels very strongly
that justice was done."
The witnesses against Thomas,
Charles Rowe and Willie Green, were standing on a corner that
morning in 1993. Both testified
that they saw Thomas near the FedEx truck, heard a shot, and saw
him stuff something in his
pants as he fled.
In his statement to the lawyers
this year, Rowe said he saw Thomas walk in front of the truck, heard
a bang, and three to five
minutes later saw Thomas walk by and wave to him and Green.
The next day, Rowe said in
the statement, Ryan and another officer took him in for questioning by
a
detective.
"I told him that I had not observed Fred Thomas do anything," Rowe stated.
He also said that authorities
seemed sure of Thomas' guilt "no matter what I answered." He said the
detective "told me that
we were suspects and that our testimony could clear us."
Rowe stated: "I did not know
what to do and just went along with it. . . . I saw him [Thomas] do
nothing that morning except
walk near the truck."
Thomas' appeal also includes
a statement from defense investigator Joseph Thornton, saying that he
talked to the other witness,
Green, in March 2000 before Green's death from cancer.
In that interview, Thornton
asserted, Green also told of having seen Thomas walk past the truck
some five minutes before
the shooting and again five minutes after, and waving.
The investigator also quoted
Green as saying that Ryan, "in highway patrol boots, forced his way into
[Green's] house that evening,"
and took him in for a night of questioning.
Thornton said Green admitted
that his testimony had been wrong: He never saw Thomas run or
conceal an object. Green
felt "that his observations were twisted," the investigator wrote.
Diviny says the defense's
new accounts are dubious at best. He said Rowe's account of who brought
him in and questioned him
that night was full of errors.
Thomas' lawyers contend that
the murder may have been drug-related. They point to the city
medical examiner's finding
of cocaine traces in Moyer's body - and to Wilkerson's recent claims
about Moyer.
"I know that Fred Thomas
had not shot the FedEx driver," Wilkerson said in his Oct. 12 statement.
"I saw 'Little Man' shoot
the driver. It was known in the neighborhood that Moyer was dealing
drugs."
Moreno declines to say more
about Wilkerson - except that he wants to put him on the witness
stand.
The lawyers contend that
Ryan was known for shaking down dealers in the area - though Ryan was
never charged with that.
One of the men Maria Fielding
identified to police was a drug dealer, the lawyers contend. They
argue that if he had been
arrested in the killing, that "would have created the very real possibility"
of
his exposing corrupt acts
by Ryan.
Diviny called that a predictable effort to smear the victim.
Moyer's father, William Sr.,
has no sympathy for Thomas. He said Thomas will likely die "in a
hospital on clean sheets,
and that's more than my son got."
http://inq.philly.com/content/inquirer/2001/12/16/front_page/FRED16.htm
| Return To Fred Thomas' Homepage |