Canadian William Samson
Alexander Mitchell
Held for months without
consular assistance or access to any legal representation
Alexander Mitchell and William Samson are forced
to confess on Saudi National television.
Briton faces beheading after bomb 'confession'
By Anton La Guardia in Riyadh, Gerald Butt
in Nicosia and David Millward
Tues Feb 6, 2001- London - Electronic Telegraph
The Foreign Office was last night seeking urgent talks with the Saudi
authorities over a Briton facing the threat of public beheading for his alleged
part in a fatal car bombing.
Derek Plumbly, the British ambassador in
Riyadh, was trying to clarify the position of
Alexander "Sandy" Mitchell who was
shown on Saudi television on Sunday night
admitting to carrying out the bombing.
Another Briton, Christopher Rodway, 47,
died in the blast on November 17, and his
wife, Janice, 50, was injured.
Mr Mitchell joined William Sampson,
a
Canadian, and Raf Schyvens, a Belgian, in
the broadcast where the men apparently
confessed to their roles in that outrage and in a second blast five days later,
which injured two Britons and an Irish citizen.
The British embassy was given no warning that Mr Mitchell - who was one of
five Britons being held in connection with alleged breaches of strict Saudi
alcohol laws - was about to confess to a crime which could lead to his public
execution. If Mr Mitchell is convicted, his fate could rest in the hands of
Christopher Rodway's widow and his father, Jeremy, from Wilton, near
Salisbury, Wiltshire.
Last night Mr Rodway, 69, supported the death penalty for those proved to
have been involved in his son's death. He said: "I know that may upset a
lot of
people. But I have always believed in an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.
I
don't necessarily want it to be as gruesome as beheading but if that's the
way
they do it there then so be it.
"You can't go around blasting people to pieces, no matter which country you're
in, and get away with it." He said he would not accept "diya" - blood money
- an
alternative offered under Shari'a, Islamic law.
In Riyadh, Prince Nayef, the Saudi interior minister, told the local paper
that the
men would be tried according to Shari'a law, which applies the death penalty
for
convicted murderers, rapists and drug smugglers. He said: "We don't have a
judicial system other than Shari'a."
The prince added that the authorities knew "the source" of the explosives,
but
declined to give more details "in the interests of the investigation". He
said the
men would be put on trial once the authorities had completed their investigation
into the blasts.
The televised confession is an ominous turn of events, suggesting that the
Saudi
authorities have decided on the men's guilt even before a trial is held. The
prince made clear that the Saudis would not bow to Western pressure to spare
the three men the full force of local law.
The only chain that seems to link Mr Mitchell with both the victims of the
bombings and five other Britons, under arrest on alcohol charges, is that
they
knew each other. The intention of the Saudi authorities appears to be to portray
them as part of a vendetta involving members of a Western alcohol racket.
But
British expatriates dispute the Saudi version of events. They say there was
no
evidence of friction between those killed and those arrested, including Mr
Mitchell.
Anyone wishing to inflict harm on a rival would only need to tip off the police.
Some believe that the truth behind the arrests is being buried behind the
televised confessions. A Briton said last night: "It is the sort of stunt
Saddam
and his bunch would employ."
THREE men, from Britain, Canada and Belgium, appeared on Saudi Arabian
television last night allegedly confessing to two bombings in the capital,
Riyadh,
last November in which a British engineer was killed.
According to an Arabic voice-over, a man identified as Alexander Mitchell
said
he had been ordered to carry out the first bombing, which killed Christopher
Rodway, 47, from Gloucestershire, who worked at the military hospital in
Riyadh. His wife, Jane, 50, was slightly hurt by the boobytrap car bomb.
The voice-over said: "I confirm and confess that I received orders to carry
out
the bombing here in Riyadh on November 17 against Christopher Rodway," .
A Canadian, identified as William
Sampson, was said to have helped him. He
added that he, the Canadian and the Belgian were involved in the second
bombing on November 22. Two nurses at the hospital were hurt, with two
British men.
Prince Nayef bin Abdel-Aziz, the Saudi Arabian interior minister, announced
the arrests of the three earlier yesterday and said nine other people of various
nationalities were being questioned. He said: "No Saudi has been arrested."
Last December, the Saudi authorities announced the arrest of an American,
Michael Sedlak, in connection with the case.
The interior minister gave no indication of who ordered the bombings, or the
motive. The attacks originally prompted fears of a campaign by Islamic militants
against British expatriates. But the fact that the victims were from the same
hospital has added credence to Saudi suggestions that they were part of a
personal vendetta.
The Foreign Office said it knew of the broadcast but could not confirm the
details. It was seeking "official confirmation" of the allegations.
Doubts over Prince's visit to Saudi Arabia
A VISIT to Saudi Arabia by the Prince of Wales later this month was "under
review" last night amid controversy over the televised confession by a Briton
accused of carrying out two bombings last year. The Prince had been planning
to go to Riyadh to open an exhibition of paintings by a member of the Saudi
royal family, Prince Khaled.
They have jointly published a book which includes Prince Charles's
watercolours of the Asir region. But as human rights groups protested at the
lack of consular access and legal representation for Alexander Mitchell, the
accused bomber, and other detained Britons, senior Foreign Office officials
were debating whether the trip should go ahead.
A spokesman for the Prince said "no date has been announced", leaving room
for the Government to postpone the trip if the bomb affair should escalate
into a
diplomatic crisis. An insider said: "It depends how the cards fall."
Death penalty dilemma
FOUR bombings and a televised confession have lifted the lid on a murky world
of alcohol dealing and illicit boozing among Saudi Arabia's expatriate
community.
The white tribe of Arabia has taken a vow of silence. Nobody knows anything,
nobody talks. The Sicilians would be impressed by such ironclad omerta, and
they know a thing or two about smuggling. In Saudi Arabia, the illicit trade
revolves around alcohol. And the business is so lucrative that scores are
being
settled violently.
Four explosions in three months killed Christopher Rodway, a Briton, partly
blinded another and injured four more Britons and an Irish woman. An Irishman
escaped death when a bomb under his car failed to explode. Last Sunday, three
Westerners - Alexander Mitchell, a Briton, William Sampson, a Canadian,
and
Ralf Skivers, a Belgian - were paraded on Saudi television to "confess" planting
the first two bombs in Riyadh.
The account of how they planted a radio-controlled bomb in a car on Nov 17,
killing Christopher Rodway and wounding his wife, and a second device under
another car less than a week later, injuring four people, was far from complete.
It gave no hint of a motive, but made vague references to receiving orders
from
abroad.
The seriousness of their position was unmistakable. The men had all but
condemned themselves to death by beheading under Saudi Arabia's Islamic
sharia code. The case has lifted the lid on a murky world of alcohol dealing
and
illicit boozing among the tens of thousands of expatriates, particularly Britons,
working in the kingdom.
One American veteran in Riyadh said: "It reminds me of Chicago in the
Twenties when gangs of bootleggers shot one another during Prohibition. Until
these bombings happened I had not realised the extent of illegal drinking,
especially among the British. I am told there are 47 illegal pubs in Riyadh."
Despite the strategic relationship with Britain, the fat defence and civil
engineering contracts, with the RAF using Saudi bases to patrol the skies
over
Iraq, the authorities in Riyadh are taking a hard line on the affair. The
Saudis
did not admit holding the key suspect, Mr Mitchell, for three weeks. Since
his
confession, they have failed to keep a promise to grant renewed consular
access to him.
Yet for a country that a decade ago took three days to admit that Kuwait had
been invaded, the Saudis have been open about announcing the bomb
explosions. British diplomats in Riyadh, by contrast, have been less than
informative. By mutual consent, Westerners and Saudis live separate lives.
The
Western housing compounds in Riyadh have long been places of refuge from
the country's rigid Wahhabi strain of Islam.
Western women walk freely without the black abbaya robe and drive their own
cars. The religious police, the Mutawa, do not enter. At one compound, the
security notice at the gate makes clear that Saudis are not to be admitted
in "in
the current situation".
The compounds provide perfect cover for illegal drinking. Villas and communal
halls have been turned into pubs. Some compounds dominated by Saudi
Arabia's 23,000 Britons are well-known for their drinking culture. The "pub"
to
which the bombings are linked is the "Celtic Corner". Others are known as
the
Empire and the Raffles.
One expatriate who has frequented some of the shebeens said: "Everything that
is illegal is available in Saudi Arabia. The place is completely hypocritical.
You
can drink every night. In some places people bring their own alcohol to parties.
Other places are set up as full-time pubs, with shelves stacked high with
bottles.
A bottle of home-brew fetches about £20. An imported whisky costs about
£100. It's big business. Some guys make more money selling alcohol than
they
earn."
The "confessions" sent shivers through the expatriate community. At least
12
people are under arrest and anybody connected to them could be swept up in
the Saudi dragnet. Any Westerner caught with a few bottles of alcohol is
vulnerable, to lashes and imprisonment at the very least. "The sewers of Riyadh
were rather fragrant as people got rid of their alcohol," said one Western
diplomat.
A nurse who knows Mr Rodway said: "I cannot talk to you. It's for my own
safety." British executives feign to be busy in meetings all day, or fail
to keep
appointments. Cornered at the city's little golf club, expats turned their
backs.
One Briton said: "I have nothing to say. Go away."
For the Saudi police, the inquiry into the bombings must be akin to investigating
some closed religious sect. A Saudi journalist with links to the intelligence
services said: "We knew that Westerners had fun in their compounds, but never
realised that they are involved in organised crime. The confessions reassure
Saudis that the authorities have quickly discovered who is behind the bombings.
They also teach the expatriates that they are not gods who can do whatever
they like."
Nobody knows what sparked the bombing campaign. Only the first two
incidents are definitely linked to alcohol smuggling. The second bomb,
diplomatic sources said, exploded near an illegal pub. The rest, such as a
small
blast at a supermarket, may have been anti-Western copycat attacks or
attempts to throw investigators off the trail.
There are few solid facts. Mr Rodway, a technician in a hospital anaesthetics
department, and the three accused appear to have known each other through
the Celtic Corner. Unconfirmed reports speak of alcohol-related deals between
Mr Rodway and Mr Mitchell, a former soldier. There are also links with a
Briton jailed in Saudi Arabia last year, whom Saudi authorities are trying
to
extradite from Dubai.
The Saudis are presenting the affair as a feud among foreigners with no Saudi
involvement. One diplomat said: "It is the only theory that holds water, but
it
also happens to be a very convenient one for the Saudis." But for some
expatriates and Western diplomats, this cannot be the complete story. Why
would foreigners draw attention to their alcohol trade by planting bombs?
Why
did the three accused confess on TV? And if they really are involved in
smuggling, who are the suppliers?
Some observers put forward the theory of a Saudi vigilante group attacking
alcohol smugglers. Others suggest that the bombings are not a feud between
foreign smugglers, but between Saudis. A Western diplomat said: "The people
who have been accused are just small fry."
The diplomat said: "It is a multi-million dollar business and where there
is money
on that scale it is inconceivable that Saudis are not behind it. It is rumoured
that
a general is involved and, if true, that would implicate some of the princes
in the
royal family. The confessions seem to be a deal to protect the big people
behind
them."
Alexander Mitchell - Death Row Saudi Arabia
The CCADP offers free webpages to over 500 Death Row Prisoners
Contact us for more information.
info@ccadp.org
"The Eyes Of The World Are Watching Now"